Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Bases

About

LLM agents have demonstrated remarkable performance across various applications, primarily due to their advanced capabilities in reasoning, utilizing external knowledge and tools, calling APIs, and executing actions to interact with environments. Current agents typically utilize a memory module or a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) mechanism, retrieving past knowledge and instances with similar embeddings from knowledge bases to inform task planning and execution. However, the reliance on unverified knowledge bases raises significant concerns about their safety and trustworthiness. To uncover such vulnerabilities, we propose a novel red teaming approach AgentPoison, the first backdoor attack targeting generic and RAG-based LLM agents by poisoning their long-term memory or RAG knowledge base. In particular, we form the trigger generation process as a constrained optimization to optimize backdoor triggers by mapping the triggered instances to a unique embedding space, so as to ensure that whenever a user instruction contains the optimized backdoor trigger, the malicious demonstrations are retrieved from the poisoned memory or knowledge base with high probability. In the meantime, benign instructions without the trigger will still maintain normal performance. Unlike conventional backdoor attacks, AgentPoison requires no additional model training or fine-tuning, and the optimized backdoor trigger exhibits superior transferability, in-context coherence, and stealthiness. Extensive experiments demonstrate AgentPoison's effectiveness in attacking three types of real-world LLM agents: RAG-based autonomous driving agent, knowledge-intensive QA agent, and healthcare EHRAgent. On each agent, AgentPoison achieves an average attack success rate higher than 80% with minimal impact on benign performance (less than 1%) with a poison rate less than 0.1%.

Zhaorun Chen, Zhen Xiang, Chaowei Xiao, Dawn Song, Bo Li• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Text-to-SQLEHRSQL
Execution Accuracy84
37
Question AnsweringStrategyQA
Exact Match (EM)83.41
35
Question AnsweringMMLU
EM65.61
35
Question AnsweringHotpotQA
EM38.4
35
SQL GenerationEHR SQL closed-weight models
Accuracy72.6
35
JailbreakingEHRAgent eICU
Success Rate (SR)51.38
30
JailbreakingEHRAgent TREQS
SR61.96
30
JailbreakingEHRAgent MIMIC-III
SR52.07
30
Question AnsweringStrategyQA, MMLU, and HotpotQA Combined
Overall Accuracy0.5835
28
Healthcare Record ManagementEHRAgent
Accuracy (ACC)74.8
24
Showing 10 of 17 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update