Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Robust Multi-Task Learning with Excess Risks

About

Multi-task learning (MTL) considers learning a joint model for multiple tasks by optimizing a convex combination of all task losses. To solve the optimization problem, existing methods use an adaptive weight updating scheme, where task weights are dynamically adjusted based on their respective losses to prioritize difficult tasks. However, these algorithms face a great challenge whenever label noise is present, in which case excessive weights tend to be assigned to noisy tasks that have relatively large Bayes optimal errors, thereby overshadowing other tasks and causing performance to drop across the board. To overcome this limitation, we propose Multi-Task Learning with Excess Risks (ExcessMTL), an excess risk-based task balancing method that updates the task weights by their distances to convergence instead. Intuitively, ExcessMTL assigns higher weights to worse-trained tasks that are further from convergence. To estimate the excess risks, we develop an efficient and accurate method with Taylor approximation. Theoretically, we show that our proposed algorithm achieves convergence guarantees and Pareto stationarity. Empirically, we evaluate our algorithm on various MTL benchmarks and demonstrate its superior performance over existing methods in the presence of label noise. Our code is available at https://github.com/yifei-he/ExcessMTL.

Yifei He, Shiji Zhou, Guojun Zhang, Hyokun Yun, Yi Xu, Belinda Zeng, Trishul Chilimbi, Han Zhao• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Depth EstimationNYU V2--
167
Semantic segmentationCityscapes
Mean IoU69.69
68
Depth EstimationCityscapes
Abs. Err.0.0128
65
Surface Normal EstimationNYU V2
Mean Angular Error26.1446
65
Image ClassificationCIFAR10 Rotation
Accuracy66.211
33
Semantic segmentationNYU V2
mIoU48.46
30
Image ClassificationCIFAR10 Partial Class C=2 (test)
Accuracy35.24
15
Image ClassificationCIFAR10 Partial Class C=2
Accuracy35.24
15
ClassificationMNIST Partial Class C=2 (test)
Accuracy91.354
15
Image ClassificationCIFAR10 Partial Class C=5
Accuracy48.142
15
Showing 10 of 25 rows

Other info

Follow for update