Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Attacking Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning by Adversarial Minority Influence

About

This study probes the vulnerabilities of cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (c-MARL) under adversarial attacks, a critical determinant of c-MARL's worst-case performance prior to real-world implementation. Current observation-based attacks, constrained by white-box assumptions, overlook c-MARL's complex multi-agent interactions and cooperative objectives, resulting in impractical and limited attack capabilities. To address these shortcomes, we propose Adversarial Minority Influence (AMI), a practical and strong for c-MARL. AMI is a practical black-box attack and can be launched without knowing victim parameters. AMI is also strong by considering the complex multi-agent interaction and the cooperative goal of agents, enabling a single adversarial agent to unilaterally misleads majority victims to form targeted worst-case cooperation. This mirrors minority influence phenomena in social psychology. To achieve maximum deviation in victim policies under complex agent-wise interactions, our unilateral attack aims to characterize and maximize the impact of the adversary on the victims. This is achieved by adapting a unilateral agent-wise relation metric derived from mutual information, thereby mitigating the adverse effects of victim influence on the adversary. To lead the victims into a jointly detrimental scenario, our targeted attack deceives victims into a long-term, cooperatively harmful situation by guiding each victim towards a specific target, determined through a trial-and-error process executed by a reinforcement learning agent. Through AMI, we achieve the first successful attack against real-world robot swarms and effectively fool agents in simulated environments into collectively worst-case scenarios, including Starcraft II and Multi-agent Mujoco. The source code and demonstrations can be found at: https://github.com/DIG-Beihang/AMI.

Simin Li, Jun Guo, Jingqiao Xiu, Yuwei Zheng, Pu Feng, Xin Yu, Aishan Liu, Yaodong Yang, Bo An, Wenjun Wu, Xianglong Liu• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Exposure Intensity evaluationSMAC II 1c3s6z vs 1c3s5z v2 (test)
Exposure Intensity2.45
24
Exposure Intensity evaluationSMAC II 1c3s5z (test)
Exposure Intensity2.1
24
Adversary RewardSMAC MMM II
Adversary Reward19.14
24
Adversary RewardSMAC 1c3s5z II
Adversary Reward18.59
24
Exposure Intensity evaluationSMAC MMM v2 (test)
Exposure Intensity2.99
24
Adversary RewardSMAC 8m II
Adversary Reward16.69
24
Exposure Intensity evaluationSMAC II 8m v2 (test)
Exposure Intensity1.93
24
Adversary RewardSMAC 1c3s6z vs 1c3s5z II
Adversary Reward18.28
24
Adversarial AttackMulti-Agent Particle Environment reference
Reward-34.26
12
Adversarial AttackSMAC 1c3s5z
Reward12.59
12
Showing 10 of 24 rows

Other info

Follow for update