Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

PromptKD: Unsupervised Prompt Distillation for Vision-Language Models

About

Prompt learning has emerged as a valuable technique in enhancing vision-language models (VLMs) such as CLIP for downstream tasks in specific domains. Existing work mainly focuses on designing various learning forms of prompts, neglecting the potential of prompts as effective distillers for learning from larger teacher models. In this paper, we introduce an unsupervised domain prompt distillation framework, which aims to transfer the knowledge of a larger teacher model to a lightweight target model through prompt-driven imitation using unlabeled domain images. Specifically, our framework consists of two distinct stages. In the initial stage, we pre-train a large CLIP teacher model using domain (few-shot) labels. After pre-training, we leverage the unique decoupled-modality characteristics of CLIP by pre-computing and storing the text features as class vectors only once through the teacher text encoder. In the subsequent stage, the stored class vectors are shared across teacher and student image encoders for calculating the predicted logits. Further, we align the logits of both the teacher and student models via KL divergence, encouraging the student image encoder to generate similar probability distributions to the teacher through the learnable prompts. The proposed prompt distillation process eliminates the reliance on labeled data, enabling the algorithm to leverage a vast amount of unlabeled images within the domain. Finally, the well-trained student image encoders and pre-stored text features (class vectors) are utilized for inference. To our best knowledge, we are the first to (1) perform unsupervised domain-specific prompt-driven knowledge distillation for CLIP, and (2) establish a practical pre-storing mechanism of text features as shared class vectors between teacher and student. Extensive experiments on 11 datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

Zheng Li, Xiang Li, Xinyi Fu, Xin Zhang, Weiqiang Wang, Shuo Chen, Jian Yang• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationStanford Cars
Accuracy75.33
635
Image ClassificationEuroSAT
Accuracy63.74
569
Image ClassificationFlowers102
Accuracy88.84
558
Image ClassificationDTD
Accuracy55.08
542
Image ClassificationDTD
Accuracy55.08
485
Image ClassificationFood101
Accuracy88.84
457
Image ClassificationUCF101
Top-1 Acc76.39
455
Image ClassificationSUN397
Accuracy68.57
441
Image ClassificationSUN397
Accuracy68.57
425
Image ClassificationImageNet
Top-1 Accuracy93.61
366
Showing 10 of 64 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update