Direct Large Language Model Alignment Through Self-Rewarding Contrastive Prompt Distillation
About
Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human expectations without human-annotated preference data is an important problem. In this paper, we propose a method to evaluate the response preference by using the output probabilities of response pairs under contrastive prompt pairs, which could achieve better performance on LLaMA2-7B and LLaMA2-13B compared to RLAIF. Based on this, we propose an automatic alignment method, Direct Large Model Alignment (DLMA). First, we use contrastive prompt pairs to automatically generate preference data. Then, we continue to evaluate the generated preference data using contrastive prompt pairs and calculate a self-rewarding score. Finally, we use the DPO algorithm to effectively align LLMs by combining this self-rewarding score. In the experimental stage, our DLMA method could surpass the \texttt{RLHF} method without relying on human-annotated preference data.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assistant Response Alignment (Helpfulness and Harmlessness) | HH-RLHF (test) | -- | 31 | |
| Harmfulness Evaluation | PKU-SafeRLHF | Beaver-7B-Cost Score-1.11 | 10 | |
| Harmfulness Evaluation | HH-Harmless | Beaver-7B Cost Score3.25 | 10 | |
| Preference Evaluation | PKU-SafeRLHF | Win Rate57 | 8 | |
| Preference Evaluation | HH-Harmless | Win Rate60 | 8 | |
| Preference Evaluation | HH-Helpful | Win Count52 | 8 | |
| LLM Alignment | HH-Harmless (test) | Win Rate59 | 2 | |
| LLM Alignment | PKU-Safety (test) | Win Rate58 | 2 |