Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Token-level Direct Preference Optimization

About

Fine-tuning pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) is essential to align them with human values and intentions. This process often utilizes methods like pairwise comparisons and KL divergence against a reference LLM, focusing on the evaluation of full answers generated by the models. However, the generation of these responses occurs in a token level, following a sequential, auto-regressive fashion. In this paper, we introduce Token-level Direct Preference Optimization (TDPO), a novel approach to align LLMs with human preferences by optimizing policy at the token level. Unlike previous methods, which face challenges in divergence efficiency, TDPO incorporates forward KL divergence constraints for each token, improving alignment and diversity. Utilizing the Bradley-Terry model for a token-based reward system, TDPO enhances the regulation of KL divergence, while preserving simplicity without the need for explicit reward modeling. Experimental results across various text tasks demonstrate TDPO's superior performance in balancing alignment with generation diversity. Notably, fine-tuning with TDPO strikes a better balance than DPO in the controlled sentiment generation and single-turn dialogue datasets, and significantly improves the quality of generated responses compared to both DPO and PPO-based RLHF methods. Our code is open-sourced at https://github.com/Vance0124/Token-level-Direct-Preference-Optimization.

Yongcheng Zeng, Guoqing Liu, Weiyu Ma, Ning Yang, Haifeng Zhang, Jun Wang• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multi-turn Dialogue EvaluationMT-Bench
Overall Score8.13
331
Physical Commonsense ReasoningPIQA
Accuracy80.89
329
Instruction FollowingIFEval--
292
Code GenerationMBPP (test)--
276
Code GenerationHumanEval 1.0 (test)
Pass@10.927
145
Mathematical ReasoningGSM8K
EM59.51
115
Code GenerationMBPP Plus (test)
Accuracy75.1
87
LLM Alignment EvaluationAlpacaEval 2
LC Win Rate46.56
72
LLM Alignment EvaluationArena Hard
Win Rate27.2
67
Instruction Following and Helpfulness EvaluationAlpacaEval 2.0
Win Rate19.44
58
Showing 10 of 16 rows

Other info

Follow for update