Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Less is More: Fewer Interpretable Region via Submodular Subset Selection

About

Image attribution algorithms aim to identify important regions that are highly relevant to model decisions. Although existing attribution solutions can effectively assign importance to target elements, they still face the following challenges: 1) existing attribution methods generate inaccurate small regions thus misleading the direction of correct attribution, and 2) the model cannot produce good attribution results for samples with wrong predictions. To address the above challenges, this paper re-models the above image attribution problem as a submodular subset selection problem, aiming to enhance model interpretability using fewer regions. To address the lack of attention to local regions, we construct a novel submodular function to discover more accurate small interpretation regions. To enhance the attribution effect for all samples, we also impose four different constraints on the selection of sub-regions, i.e., confidence, effectiveness, consistency, and collaboration scores, to assess the importance of various subsets. Moreover, our theoretical analysis substantiates that the proposed function is in fact submodular. Extensive experiments show that the proposed method outperforms SOTA methods on two face datasets (Celeb-A and VGG-Face2) and one fine-grained dataset (CUB-200-2011). For correctly predicted samples, the proposed method improves the Deletion and Insertion scores with an average of 4.9% and 2.5% gain relative to HSIC-Attribution. For incorrectly predicted samples, our method achieves gains of 81.0% and 18.4% compared to the HSIC-Attribution algorithm in the average highest confidence and Insertion score respectively. The code is released at https://github.com/RuoyuChen10/SMDL-Attribution.

Ruoyu Chen, Hua Zhang, Siyuan Liang, Jingzhi Li, Xiaochun Cao• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Cause discovery for incorrect predictionsCUB-200 2011
Avg Highest Confidence (0-25%)0.2616
24
Attribution FaithfulnessCeleb-A (val)
Deletion Score10.54
12
Attribution FaithfulnessVGGFace2 (val)
Deletion Score0.1304
12
Attribution FaithfulnessCUB-200-2011 (val)
Deletion Score0.0613
12
Discovering the causes of incorrect predictionsCUB-200-2011 (val)
Avg Highest Confidence (Top 25%)0.2491
7
Showing 5 of 5 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update