Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

VideoPhy: Evaluating Physical Commonsense for Video Generation

About

Recent advances in internet-scale video data pretraining have led to the development of text-to-video generative models that can create high-quality videos across a broad range of visual concepts, synthesize realistic motions and render complex objects. Hence, these generative models have the potential to become general-purpose simulators of the physical world. However, it is unclear how far we are from this goal with the existing text-to-video generative models. To this end, we present VideoPhy, a benchmark designed to assess whether the generated videos follow physical commonsense for real-world activities (e.g. marbles will roll down when placed on a slanted surface). Specifically, we curate diverse prompts that involve interactions between various material types in the physical world (e.g., solid-solid, solid-fluid, fluid-fluid). We then generate videos conditioned on these captions from diverse state-of-the-art text-to-video generative models, including open models (e.g., CogVideoX) and closed models (e.g., Lumiere, Dream Machine). Our human evaluation reveals that the existing models severely lack the ability to generate videos adhering to the given text prompts, while also lack physical commonsense. Specifically, the best performing model, CogVideoX-5B, generates videos that adhere to the caption and physical laws for 39.6% of the instances. VideoPhy thus highlights that the video generative models are far from accurately simulating the physical world. Finally, we propose an auto-evaluator, VideoCon-Physics, to assess the performance reliably for the newly released models.

Hritik Bansal, Zongyu Lin, Tianyi Xie, Zeshun Zong, Michal Yarom, Yonatan Bitton, Chenfanfu Jiang, Yizhou Sun, Kai-Wei Chang, Aditya Grover• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
TACurated Prompt Set (OOD)
RM Accuracy0.6052
8
Physical Plausibility and Subject DeformityInternal Dataset (ID train)
RM ACC67.35
8
TAInternal ID (train)
RM ACC0.5485
8
Physical Plausibility and Subject DeformityCurated Prompt Set (OOD)
RM ACC65.1
8
Correlation to Human PreferenceHuman Preference Annotations Physics Scenarios (test)
Correlation: Ball Collision20
4
Video Motion Quality Assessment AlignmentHuman-motion prompt set (Body Structure)--
1
Video Motion Quality Assessment AlignmentHuman-motion prompt set Balance--
1
Video Motion Quality Assessment AlignmentHuman-motion prompt set (Motion Naturalness)--
1
Video Motion Quality Assessment AlignmentHuman-motion prompt set All Questions--
1
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update