MelissaDL x Breed: Towards Data-Efficient On-line Supervised Training of Multi-parametric Surrogates with Active Learning
About
Artificial intelligence is transforming scientific computing with deep neural network surrogates that approximate solutions to partial differential equations (PDEs). Traditional off-line training methods face issues with storage and I/O efficiency, as the training dataset has to be computed with numerical solvers up-front. Our previous work, the Melissa framework, addresses these problems by enabling data to be created "on-the-fly" and streamed directly into the training process. In this paper we introduce a new active learning method to enhance data-efficiency for on-line surrogate training. The surrogate is direct and multi-parametric, i.e., it is trained to predict a given timestep directly with different initial and boundary conditions parameters. Our approach uses Adaptive Multiple Importance Sampling guided by training loss statistics, in order to focus NN training on the difficult areas of the parameter space. Preliminary results for 2D heat PDE demonstrate the potential of this method, called Breed, to improve the generalization capabilities of surrogates while reducing computational overhead.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDE solving | Navier-Stokes 2D | -- | 34 | |
| PDE solving | 2D Kuramoto-Sivashinsky (test) | Mean Error0.81 | 27 | |
| PDE Surrogate Modeling | 2D Kuramoto-Sivashinsky and Gray-Scott | Mean Error0.82 | 24 | |
| PDE solving | Navier-Stokes 2D (test) | Relative MSE Loss0.93 | 24 | |
| Active Learning | 2D Navier-Stokes Kolmogorov flow (test) | Mean Error1.23 | 21 | |
| PDE solving | 2D Gray-Scott | Mean Error1.47 | 14 | |
| Partial Differential Equation (PDE) Solving | Gray-Scott PDE (test) | Mean Improvement Ratio1.02 | 12 | |
| Neural PDE Solving | Gray–Scott Eq. Forward 2D (test) | Mean Error1.44 | 7 | |
| 2D Kuramoto-Sivashinsky PDE Simulation | 2D Kuramoto-Sivashinsky | Mean Error4.91 | 7 | |
| 2D Kuramoto-Sivashinsky Prediction | 2D Kuramoto-Sivashinsky | Mean Prediction Error1.43 | 7 |