Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

TabPedia: Towards Comprehensive Visual Table Understanding with Concept Synergy

About

Tables contain factual and quantitative data accompanied by various structures and contents that pose challenges for machine comprehension. Previous methods generally design task-specific architectures and objectives for individual tasks, resulting in modal isolation and intricate workflows. In this paper, we present a novel large vision-language model, TabPedia, equipped with a concept synergy mechanism. In this mechanism, all the involved diverse visual table understanding (VTU) tasks and multi-source visual embeddings are abstracted as concepts. This unified framework allows TabPedia to seamlessly integrate VTU tasks, such as table detection, table structure recognition, table querying, and table question answering, by leveraging the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Moreover, the concept synergy mechanism enables table perception-related and comprehension-related tasks to work in harmony, as they can effectively leverage the needed clues from the corresponding source perception embeddings. Furthermore, to better evaluate the VTU task in real-world scenarios, we establish a new and comprehensive table VQA benchmark, ComTQA, featuring approximately 9,000 QA pairs. Extensive quantitative and qualitative experiments on both table perception and comprehension tasks, conducted across various public benchmarks, validate the effectiveness of our TabPedia. The superior performance further confirms the feasibility of using LLMs for understanding visual tables when all concepts work in synergy. The benchmark ComTQA has been open-sourced at https://huggingface.co/datasets/ByteDance/ComTQA. The source code and model also have been released athttps://github.com/zhaowc-ustc/TabPedia.

Weichao Zhao, Hao Feng, Qi Liu, Jingqun Tang, Shu Wei, Binghong Wu, Lei Liao, Yongjie Ye, Hao Liu, Wengang Zhou, Houqiang Li, Can Huang• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Table Question AnsweringWTQ
Accuracy21.71
101
Table Question AnsweringTabMWP
Accuracy18.88
53
Table Question AnsweringWTQ (test)
Denotation Accuracy47.8
45
Table Fact VerificationTabFact
Accuracy0.5053
36
Table Fact VerificationInfoTabs
Average Score20.84
30
Table Question AnsweringTAT-QA
Average Score20.84
30
Table Question AnsweringHiTab
Accuracy5.58
30
Table Visual Question AnsweringTabFact (test)
Accuracy0.713
15
Table Structure RecognitionPubTables-1M
GriTS Top Score96.52
6
Table Question AnsweringComTQA (test)
Accuracy53.5
5
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update