Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Focus on Your Question! Interpreting and Mitigating Toxic CoT Problems in Commonsense Reasoning

About

Large language models exhibit high-level commonsense reasoning abilities, especially with enhancement methods like Chain-of-Thought (CoT). However, we find these CoT-like methods lead to a considerable number of originally correct answers turning wrong, which we define as the Toxic CoT problem. To interpret and mitigate this problem, we first utilize attribution tracing and causal tracing methods to probe the internal working mechanism of the LLM during CoT reasoning. Through comparisons, we prove that the model exhibits information loss from the question over the shallow attention layers when generating rationales or answers. Based on the probing findings, we design a novel method called RIDERS (Residual decodIng and sERial-position Swap), which compensates for the information deficit in the model from both decoding and serial-position perspectives. Through extensive experiments on multiple commonsense reasoning benchmarks, we validate that this method not only significantly eliminates Toxic CoT problems (decreased by 23.6%), but also effectively improves the model's overall commonsense reasoning performance (increased by 5.5%).

Jiachun Li, Pengfei Cao, Chenhao Wang, Zhuoran Jin, Yubo Chen, Daojian Zeng, Kang Liu, Jun Zhao• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Commonsense ReasoningHellaSwag
Accuracy46.3
1460
Commonsense ReasoningPIQA
Accuracy67.7
647
Commonsense ReasoningCSQA
Accuracy71.3
366
Commonsense ReasoningWinoGrande
Accuracy70.1
231
Commonsense ReasoningSIQA
Accuracy72.1
96
Commonsense ReasoningWinoGrande
Accuracy70.1
38
Logical reasoningProofWriter
Accuracy78.2
32
Logical reasoningFOLIO
Accuracy48
2
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update