Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

$\gamma-$MoD: Exploring Mixture-of-Depth Adaptation for Multimodal Large Language Models

About

Despite the significant progress in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), their high computational cost remains a barrier to real-world deployment. Inspired by the mixture of depths (MoDs) in natural language processing, we aim to address this limitation from the perspective of ``activated tokens''. Our key insight is that if most tokens are redundant for the layer computation, then can be skipped directly via the MoD layer. However, directly converting the dense layers of MLLMs to MoD layers leads to substantial performance degradation. To address this issue, we propose an innovative MoD adaptation strategy for existing MLLMs called $\gamma$-MoD. In $\gamma$-MoD, a novel metric is proposed to guide the deployment of MoDs in the MLLM, namely rank of attention maps (ARank). Through ARank, we can effectively identify which layer is redundant and should be replaced with the MoD layer. Based on ARank, we further propose two novel designs to maximize the computational sparsity of MLLM while maintaining its performance, namely shared vision-language router and masked routing learning. With these designs, more than 90% dense layers of the MLLM can be effectively converted to the MoD ones. To validate our method, we apply it to three popular MLLMs, and conduct extensive experiments on 9 benchmark datasets. Experimental results not only validate the significant efficiency benefit of $\gamma$-MoD to existing MLLMs but also confirm its generalization ability on various MLLMs. For example, with a minor performance drop, i.e., -1.5%, $\gamma$-MoD can reduce the training and inference time of LLaVA-HR by 31.0% and 53.2%, respectively.

Yaxin Luo, Gen Luo, Jiayi Ji, Yiyi Zhou, Xiaoshuai Sun, Zhiqiang Shen, Rongrong Ji• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2
Accuracy82
1165
Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
Accuracy66.8
1117
Visual Question AnsweringGQA
Accuracy64.8
963
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy87.3
935
Multimodal EvaluationMME
Score1.52e+3
557
Multimodal UnderstandingMMBench
Accuracy65.2
367
Multimodal Capability EvaluationMM-Vet
Score34
282
Multimodal UnderstandingMMMU
Accuracy35.8
275
Visual Question AnsweringScienceQA (SQAI)
Accuracy69.5
35
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update