DocLayout-YOLO: Enhancing Document Layout Analysis through Diverse Synthetic Data and Global-to-Local Adaptive Perception
About
Document Layout Analysis is crucial for real-world document understanding systems, but it encounters a challenging trade-off between speed and accuracy: multimodal methods leveraging both text and visual features achieve higher accuracy but suffer from significant latency, whereas unimodal methods relying solely on visual features offer faster processing speeds at the expense of accuracy. To address this dilemma, we introduce DocLayout-YOLO, a novel approach that enhances accuracy while maintaining speed advantages through document-specific optimizations in both pre-training and model design. For robust document pre-training, we introduce the Mesh-candidate BestFit algorithm, which frames document synthesis as a two-dimensional bin packing problem, generating the large-scale, diverse DocSynth-300K dataset. Pre-training on the resulting DocSynth-300K dataset significantly improves fine-tuning performance across various document types. In terms of model optimization, we propose a Global-to-Local Controllable Receptive Module that is capable of better handling multi-scale variations of document elements. Furthermore, to validate performance across different document types, we introduce a complex and challenging benchmark named DocStructBench. Extensive experiments on downstream datasets demonstrate that DocLayout-YOLO excels in both speed and accuracy. Code, data, and models are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/DocLayout-YOLO.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Text Generation | OHR-Bench Generation | Text Score41.9 | 14 | |
| Textual RAG | OHR-Bench (Overall) | TXT Score0.385 | 14 | |
| Document Retrieval | OHR-Bench Retrieval | Accuracy (Text)63.5 | 14 | |
| Document Layout Analysis | DocLayNet | mAP79.7 | 13 | |
| Document Layout Analysis | D4LA | mAP70.3 | 7 | |
| Visual RAG | Allganize | TXT Score69.5 | 5 | |
| Textual RAG | BizMMRAG Japanese (test) | TXT Score61.7 | 5 | |
| Textual RAG | Allganize Japanese (test) | TXT Score49.3 | 5 | |
| Visual RAG | OHR-Bench (test) | TXT Score72.2 | 5 | |
| Visual RAG | BizMMRAG | Score (TXT)55 | 5 |