Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

RaTEScore: A Metric for Radiology Report Generation

About

This paper introduces a novel, entity-aware metric, termed as Radiological Report (Text) Evaluation (RaTEScore), to assess the quality of medical reports generated by AI models. RaTEScore emphasizes crucial medical entities such as diagnostic outcomes and anatomical details, and is robust against complex medical synonyms and sensitive to negation expressions. Technically, we developed a comprehensive medical NER dataset, RaTE-NER, and trained an NER model specifically for this purpose. This model enables the decomposition of complex radiological reports into constituent medical entities. The metric itself is derived by comparing the similarity of entity embeddings, obtained from a language model, based on their types and relevance to clinical significance. Our evaluations demonstrate that RaTEScore aligns more closely with human preference than existing metrics, validated both on established public benchmarks and our newly proposed RaTE-Eval benchmark.

Weike Zhao, Chaoyi Wu, Xiaoman Zhang, Ya Zhang, Yanfeng Wang, Weidi Xie• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Correlation with radiologist-derived clinically significant error countsReXVal RadGraph-optimized candidate reports (n = 50)
Kendall τ0.57
12
Correlation with radiologist-derived clinically significant error countsReXVal BERTScore-optimized candidate reports (n = 50)
Kendall Tau0.49
12
Correlation with radiologist-derived clinically significant error countsReXVal BLEU-optimized candidate reports (n = 50)
Kendall Tau0.54
12
Correlation with radiologist-derived clinically significant error countsReXVal CheXbert-optimized candidate reports (n = 50)
Kendall's τ0.39
12
Metric Correlation with Human JudgmentCT-RATE
Pearson Correlation0.521
7
Metric Correlation with Human JudgmentMerlin
Pearson Correlation0.334
7
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Follow for update