RaTEScore: A Metric for Radiology Report Generation
About
This paper introduces a novel, entity-aware metric, termed as Radiological Report (Text) Evaluation (RaTEScore), to assess the quality of medical reports generated by AI models. RaTEScore emphasizes crucial medical entities such as diagnostic outcomes and anatomical details, and is robust against complex medical synonyms and sensitive to negation expressions. Technically, we developed a comprehensive medical NER dataset, RaTE-NER, and trained an NER model specifically for this purpose. This model enables the decomposition of complex radiological reports into constituent medical entities. The metric itself is derived by comparing the similarity of entity embeddings, obtained from a language model, based on their types and relevance to clinical significance. Our evaluations demonstrate that RaTEScore aligns more closely with human preference than existing metrics, validated both on established public benchmarks and our newly proposed RaTE-Eval benchmark.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation with radiologist-derived clinically significant error counts | ReXVal RadGraph-optimized candidate reports (n = 50) | Kendall τ0.57 | 12 | |
| Correlation with radiologist-derived clinically significant error counts | ReXVal BERTScore-optimized candidate reports (n = 50) | Kendall Tau0.49 | 12 | |
| Correlation with radiologist-derived clinically significant error counts | ReXVal BLEU-optimized candidate reports (n = 50) | Kendall Tau0.54 | 12 | |
| Correlation with radiologist-derived clinically significant error counts | ReXVal CheXbert-optimized candidate reports (n = 50) | Kendall's τ0.39 | 12 | |
| Metric Correlation with Human Judgment | CT-RATE | Pearson Correlation0.521 | 7 | |
| Metric Correlation with Human Judgment | Merlin | Pearson Correlation0.334 | 7 |