Coarse-to-Fine Highlighting: Reducing Knowledge Hallucination in Large Language Models
About
Generation of plausible but incorrect factual information, often termed hallucination, has attracted significant research interest. Retrieval-augmented language model (RALM) -- which enhances models with up-to-date knowledge -- emerges as a promising method to reduce hallucination. However, existing RALMs may instead exacerbate hallucination when retrieving lengthy contexts. To address this challenge, we propose COFT, a novel \textbf{CO}arse-to-\textbf{F}ine highligh\textbf{T}ing method to focus on different granularity-level key texts, thereby avoiding getting lost in lengthy contexts. Specifically, COFT consists of three components: \textit{recaller}, \textit{scorer}, and \textit{selector}. First, \textit{recaller} applies a knowledge graph to extract potential key entities in a given context. Second, \textit{scorer} measures the importance of each entity by calculating its contextual weight. Finally, \textit{selector} selects high contextual weight entities with a dynamic threshold algorithm and highlights the corresponding paragraphs, sentences, or words in a coarse-to-fine manner. Extensive experiments on the knowledge hallucination benchmark demonstrate the effectiveness of COFT, leading to a superior performance over $30\%$ in the F1 score metric. Moreover, COFT also exhibits remarkable versatility across various long-form tasks, such as reading comprehension and question answering.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question Answering | 2Wiki | EM45.5 | 241 | |
| Multi-hop Question Answering | HotpotQA | LLM Judge Score61.71 | 72 | |
| Question Answering | Bamboogle | EM40.3 | 61 | |
| Question Answering | MuSiQue | EM18.5 | 38 | |
| Multi-hop Question Answering | 2Wiki | EM41.86 | 16 | |
| Multi-hop Question Answering | Bamboogle | EM35.71 | 16 | |
| Multi-hop Question Answering | MuSiQue | EM17.12 | 16 | |
| Multi-question Reasoning | MuSiQue-3Q | Exact Match (EM)12.6 | 6 | |
| Multi-question Reasoning | HotpotQA 3Q | Exact Match Accuracy (3Q)24.5 | 6 | |
| Multi-question Reasoning | 2Wiki-3Q | Exact Match (EM)27.2 | 6 |