Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Mitigating Object Hallucination via Concentric Causal Attention

About

Recent Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) present remarkable zero-shot conversational and reasoning capabilities given multimodal queries. Nevertheless, they suffer from object hallucination, a phenomenon where LVLMs are prone to generate textual responses not factually aligned with image inputs. Our pilot study reveals that object hallucination is closely tied with Rotary Position Encoding (RoPE), a widely adopted positional dependency modeling design in existing LVLMs. Due to the long-term decay in RoPE, LVLMs tend to hallucinate more when relevant visual cues are distant from instruction tokens in the multimodal input sequence. Additionally, we observe a similar effect when reversing the sequential order of visual tokens during multimodal alignment. Our tests indicate that long-term decay in RoPE poses challenges to LVLMs while capturing visual-instruction interactions across long distances. We propose Concentric Causal Attention (CCA), a simple yet effective positional alignment strategy that mitigates the impact of RoPE long-term decay in LVLMs by naturally reducing relative distance between visual and instruction tokens. With CCA, visual tokens can better interact with instruction tokens, thereby enhancing model's perception capability and alleviating object hallucination. Without bells and whistles, our positional alignment method surpasses existing hallucination mitigation strategies by large margins on multiple object hallucination benchmarks.

Yun Xing, Yiheng Li, Ivan Laptev, Shijian Lu• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy86.5
935
Multimodal EvaluationMME--
557
Hallucination EvaluationMMHal-Bench
MMHal Score1.92
174
Hallucination EvaluationAMBER
F1 Score81.9
71
Object Hallucination EvaluationCHAIR
CS Score43
49
Hallucination assessmentObject-HalBench
Mention Hallucination Rate23.8
39
Hallucination assessmentMHumanEval
Response Rate68.5
20
Free-format Multimodal Hallucination AssessmentRefoMB (dev)
Trust41.9
20
Multimodal Capability EvaluationMM-Star
Average Score32.1
18
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update