Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Angel or Devil: Discriminating Hard Samples and Anomaly Contaminations for Unsupervised Time Series Anomaly Detection

About

Training in unsupervised time series anomaly detection is constantly plagued by the discrimination between harmful `anomaly contaminations' and beneficial `hard normal samples'. These two samples exhibit analogous loss behavior that conventional loss-based methodologies struggle to differentiate. To tackle this problem, we propose a novel approach that supplements traditional loss behavior with `parameter behavior', enabling a more granular characterization of anomalous patterns. Parameter behavior is formalized by measuring the parametric response to minute perturbations in input samples. Leveraging the complementary nature of parameter and loss behaviors, we further propose a dual Parameter-Loss Data Augmentation method (termed PLDA), implemented within the reinforcement learning paradigm. During the training phase of anomaly detection, PLDA dynamically augments the training data through an iterative process that simultaneously mitigates anomaly contaminations while amplifying informative hard normal samples. PLDA demonstrates remarkable versatility, which can serve as an additional component that seamlessly integrated with existing anomaly detectors to enhance their detection performance. Extensive experiments on ten datasets show that PLDA significantly improves the performance of four distinct detectors by up to 8\%, outperforming three state-of-the-art data augmentation methods.

Ruyi Zhang, Hongzuo Xu, Songlei Jian, Yusong Tan, Haifang Zhou, Rulin Xu• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Anomaly DetectionSMD
F1 Score81.6
359
Time Series Anomaly DetectionSMAP
F1 Score71.1
48
Time Series Anomaly DetectionMSL
F1 Score89
35
Time Series Anomaly DetectionPUMP
F1-score97.2
28
Time Series Anomaly DetectionASD
F1 Score85.2
16
Time Series Anomaly DetectionDSADS
F1 Score97.8
16
Time Series Anomaly DetectionFault
F1-score98.9
16
Time Series Anomaly DetectionHeart
F1 Score85.4
16
Time Series Anomaly DetectionSWaT
F1-score94.7
16
Time Series Anomaly DetectionGait
F1 Score95.4
16
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update