Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Large language models can be zero-shot anomaly detectors for time series?

About

Recent studies have shown the ability of large language models to perform a variety of tasks, including time series forecasting. The flexible nature of these models allows them to be used for many applications. In this paper, we present a novel study of large language models used for the challenging task of time series anomaly detection. This problem entails two aspects novel for LLMs: the need for the model to identify part of the input sequence (or multiple parts) as anomalous; and the need for it to work with time series data rather than the traditional text input. We introduce sigllm, a framework for time series anomaly detection using large language models. Our framework includes a time-series-to-text conversion module, as well as end-to-end pipelines that prompt language models to perform time series anomaly detection. We investigate two paradigms for testing the abilities of large language models to perform the detection task. First, we present a prompt-based detection method that directly asks a language model to indicate which elements of the input are anomalies. Second, we leverage the forecasting capability of a large language model to guide the anomaly detection process. We evaluated our framework on 11 datasets spanning various sources and 10 pipelines. We show that the forecasting method significantly outperformed the prompting method in all 11 datasets with respect to the F1 score. Moreover, while large language models are capable of finding anomalies, state-of-the-art deep learning models are still superior in performance, achieving results 30% better than large language models.

Sarah Alnegheimish, Linh Nguyen, Laure Berti-Equille, Kalyan Veeramachaneni• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Anomaly DetectionWADI
Training Time (s/epoch)5.76e+3
24
Time Series Anomaly DetectionWSD
F1 Score0.428
24
Time Series Anomaly DetectionTODS
F1 Score17.4
24
Time Series Anomaly DetectionMackey
Precision6.3
18
Anomaly Location DetectionAnomLLM (test)
Frequency Precision (P)16.9
14
Anomaly DetectionSimulation
Average Time Cost1
13
Anomaly DetectionSim-Palletizer
Precision82.7
13
Anomaly DetectionSim-Converge Station
Precision81.3
13
Anomaly DetectionSim-Level Control
Precision74.5
13
Anomaly DetectionSim-Sorting by Weight
Precision67.4
13
Showing 10 of 23 rows

Other info

Follow for update