Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Imprecise Label Learning: A Unified Framework for Learning with Various Imprecise Label Configurations

About

Learning with reduced labeling standards, such as noisy label, partial label, and multiple label candidates, which we generically refer to as \textit{imprecise} labels, is a commonplace challenge in machine learning tasks. Previous methods tend to propose specific designs for every emerging imprecise label configuration, which is usually unsustainable when multiple configurations of imprecision coexist. In this paper, we introduce imprecise label learning (ILL), a framework for the unification of learning with various imprecise label configurations. ILL leverages expectation-maximization (EM) for modeling the imprecise label information, treating the precise labels as latent variables.Instead of approximating the correct labels for training, it considers the entire distribution of all possible labeling entailed by the imprecise information. We demonstrate that ILL can seamlessly adapt to partial label learning, semi-supervised learning, noisy label learning, and, more importantly, a mixture of these settings. Notably, ILL surpasses the existing specified techniques for handling imprecise labels, marking the first unified framework with robust and effective performance across various challenging settings. We hope our work will inspire further research on this topic, unleashing the full potential of ILL in wider scenarios where precise labels are expensive and complicated to obtain.

Hao Chen, Ankit Shah, Jindong Wang, Ran Tao, Yidong Wang, Xing Xie, Masashi Sugiyama, Rita Singh, Bhiksha Raj• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 l=50000 (test)
Accuracy96.47
36
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 l=50000 (test)
Accuracy0.7753
36
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N (test)
Accuracy (Random 1)96.06
31
Noisy Label LearningCIFAR-10
Accuracy96.78
23
Noisy Label LearningCIFAR-100
Accuracy77.49
23
Partial-Label Image ClassificationCIFAR-10
Accuracy96.37
22
Partial-Label Image ClassificationCIFAR-100
Accuracy75.31
22
Text ClassificationYelp Review (1000 labels)
Top-1 Error Rate39.67
19
Text ClassificationAmazon Review 250 labels (test)
Top-1 Error Rate43.96
19
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 N (test)
Accuracy (Noisy)68.07
19
Showing 10 of 41 rows

Other info

Follow for update