Self-Improvement for Neural Combinatorial Optimization: Sample without Replacement, but Improvement
About
Current methods for end-to-end constructive neural combinatorial optimization usually train a policy using behavior cloning from expert solutions or policy gradient methods from reinforcement learning. While behavior cloning is straightforward, it requires expensive expert solutions, and policy gradient methods are often computationally demanding and complex to fine-tune. In this work, we bridge the two and simplify the training process by sampling multiple solutions for random instances using the current model in each epoch and then selecting the best solution as an expert trajectory for supervised imitation learning. To achieve progressively improving solutions with minimal sampling, we introduce a method that combines round-wise Stochastic Beam Search with an update strategy derived from a provable policy improvement. This strategy refines the policy between rounds by utilizing the advantage of the sampled sequences with almost no computational overhead. We evaluate our approach on the Traveling Salesman Problem and the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem. The models trained with our method achieve comparable performance and generalization to those trained with expert data. Additionally, we apply our method to the Job Shop Scheduling Problem using a transformer-based architecture and outperform existing state-of-the-art methods by a wide margin.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job Shop Scheduling | ta | Gap to BKS1.7 | 72 | |
| Job Shop Scheduling | Taillard JSP instances | Average Gap (%)7.8 | 47 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem | Uniform-TSP1000 | Optimality Gap1.569 | 44 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem | Uniform-TSP100 | Optimality Gap9.2 | 41 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem | TSP5K generated | Tour Length55.77 | 32 | |
| Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) | Synthetic TSP1K | Objective Value23.36 | 21 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) | Synthetic CVRP5K | Objective Value103.5 | 20 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) | Synthetic CVRP1K | Objective Value39.15 | 20 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) | Synthetic CVRP10K | Objective Value131.5 | 18 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) | Synthetic CVRP50K | Objective Value477.4 | 15 |