Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Efficient Adversarial Training in LLMs with Continuous Attacks

About

Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that can bypass their safety guardrails. In many domains, adversarial training has proven to be one of the most promising methods to reliably improve robustness against such attacks. Yet, in the context of LLMs, current methods for adversarial training are hindered by the high computational costs required to perform discrete adversarial attacks at each training iteration. We address this problem by instead calculating adversarial attacks in the continuous embedding space of the LLM, which is orders of magnitudes more efficient. We propose a fast adversarial training algorithm (C-AdvUL) composed of two losses: the first makes the model robust on continuous embedding attacks computed on an adversarial behaviour dataset; the second ensures the usefulness of the final model by fine-tuning on utility data. Moreover, we introduce C-AdvIPO, an adversarial variant of IPO that does not require utility data for adversarially robust alignment. Our empirical evaluation on five models from different families (Gemma, Phi3, Mistral, Zephyr, Llama2) and at different scales (2B, 3.8B, 7B) shows that both algorithms substantially enhance LLM robustness against discrete attacks (GCG, AutoDAN, PAIR), while maintaining utility. Our results demonstrate that robustness to continuous perturbations can extrapolate to discrete threat models. Thereby, we present a path toward scalable adversarial training algorithms for robustly aligning LLMs.

Sophie Xhonneux, Alessandro Sordoni, Stephan G\"unnemann, Gauthier Gidel, Leo Schwinn• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multi-task Language UnderstandingMMLU--
876
Multi-turn Dialogue EvaluationMT-Bench
Overall Score60.4
447
Question AnsweringARC-E
Accuracy77.5
416
Instruction FollowingAlpacaEval--
227
Question AnsweringARC-C
Accuracy51.5
192
ReasoningARC Easy--
187
ReasoningARC Challenge
Accuracy60.7
93
Over-refusalXSTest
Overrefusal Rate7
78
Language UnderstandingMMLU
Average Accuracy67
50
General Knowledge EvaluationMMLU
MMLU Accuracy78.7
45
Showing 10 of 24 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update