Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

TableGPT2: A Large Multimodal Model with Tabular Data Integration

About

The emergence of models like GPTs, Claude, LLaMA, and Qwen has reshaped AI applications, presenting vast new opportunities across industries. Yet, the integration of tabular data remains notably underdeveloped, despite its foundational role in numerous real-world domains. This gap is critical for three main reasons. First, database or data warehouse data integration is essential for advanced applications; second, the vast and largely untapped resource of tabular data offers immense potential for analysis; and third, the business intelligence domain specifically demands adaptable, precise solutions that many current LLMs may struggle to provide. In response, we introduce TableGPT2, a model rigorously pre-trained and fine-tuned with over 593.8K tables and 2.36M high-quality query-table-output tuples, a scale of table-related data unprecedented in prior research. This extensive training enables TableGPT2 to excel in table-centric tasks while maintaining strong general language and coding abilities. One of TableGPT2's key innovations is its novel table encoder, specifically designed to capture schema-level and cell-level information. This encoder strengthens the model's ability to handle ambiguous queries, missing column names, and irregular tables commonly encountered in real-world applications. Similar to visual language models, this pioneering approach integrates with the decoder to form a robust large multimodal model. We believe the results are compelling: over 23 benchmarking metrics, TableGPT2 achieves an average performance improvement of 35.20% in the 7B model and 49.32% in the 72B model over prior benchmark-neutral LLMs, with robust general-purpose capabilities intact.

Aofeng Su, Aowen Wang, Chao Ye, Chen Zhou, Ga Zhang, Gang Chen, Guangcheng Zhu, Haobo Wang, Haokai Xu, Hao Chen, Haoze Li, Haoxuan Lan, Jiaming Tian, Jing Yuan, Junbo Zhao, Junlin Zhou, Kaizhe Shou, Liangyu Zha, Lin Long, Liyao Li, Pengzuo Wu, Qi Zhang, Qingyi Huang, Saisai Yang, Tao Zhang, Wentao Ye, Wufang Zhu, Xiaomeng Hu, Xijun Gu, Xinjie Sun, Xiang Li, Yuhang Yang, Zhiqing Xiao• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Instruction FollowingIFEval--
292
Table Question AnsweringWTQ
Accuracy62.15
101
Tabular Classification75 Tabular Classification Datasets (test)
Accuracy47.93
89
Tabular Regression52 Tabular Datasets (test)
NMAE0.473
85
Table Question AnsweringHiTab
Accuracy73.97
67
Text-to-SQLSpider--
57
Table Question AnsweringTabMWP
Accuracy49.35
53
Chart GenerationRealHitBench
ECR67.53
49
Data AnalysisRealHitBench
GPT Score62.76
49
Fact CheckingRealHitBench
Exact Match46.1
49
Showing 10 of 34 rows

Other info

Follow for update