Weak-to-Strong Search: Align Large Language Models via Searching over Small Language Models
About
Large language models are usually fine-tuned to align with human preferences. However, fine-tuning a large language model can be challenging. In this work, we introduce $\textit{weak-to-strong search}$, framing the alignment of a large language model as a test-time greedy search to maximize the log-probability difference between small tuned and untuned models while sampling from the frozen large model. This method serves both as (1) a compute-efficient model up-scaling strategy that avoids directly tuning the large model and as (2) an instance of weak-to-strong generalization that enhances a strong model with weak test-time guidance. Empirically, we demonstrate the flexibility of weak-to-strong search across different tasks. In controlled-sentiment generation and summarization, we use tuned and untuned $\texttt{gpt2}$s to improve the alignment of large models without additional training. Crucially, in a more difficult instruction-following benchmark, AlpacaEval 2.0, we show that reusing off-the-shelf small models (e.g., $\texttt{zephyr-7b-beta}$ and its untuned version) can improve the length-controlled win rates of both white-box and black-box large models against $\texttt{gpt-4-turbo}$ (e.g., $34.4\% \rightarrow 37.9\%$ for $\texttt{Llama-3-70B-Instruct}$ and $16.0\% \rightarrow 20.1\%$ for $\texttt{gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct}$), despite the small models' low win rates $\approx 10.0\%$.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Evaluation | AdvBench | -- | 117 | |
| Instruction Following | AlpacaEval 2.0 (test) | LC Win Rate (%)39.09 | 81 | |
| Truthfulness Evaluation | TruthfulQA | -- | 33 | |
| Truthfulness | TruthfulQA | Reward-2.59 | 32 | |
| Safety Alignment | AdvBench | Reward-2.11 | 32 | |
| Preference Alignment | HH-RLHF | -- | 31 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | GSM8K (test) | Reward-0.53 | 8 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | MATH (test) | Reward-2.02 | 8 |