Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Pixel-Inconsistency Modeling for Image Manipulation Localization

About

Digital image forensics plays a crucial role in image authentication and manipulation localization. Despite the progress powered by deep neural networks, existing forgery localization methodologies exhibit limitations when deployed to unseen datasets and perturbed images (i.e., lack of generalization and robustness to real-world applications). To circumvent these problems and aid image integrity, this paper presents a generalized and robust manipulation localization model through the analysis of pixel inconsistency artifacts. The rationale is grounded on the observation that most image signal processors (ISP) involve the demosaicing process, which introduces pixel correlations in pristine images. Moreover, manipulating operations, including splicing, copy-move, and inpainting, directly affect such pixel regularity. We, therefore, first split the input image into several blocks and design masked self-attention mechanisms to model the global pixel dependency in input images. Simultaneously, we optimize another local pixel dependency stream to mine local manipulation clues within input forgery images. In addition, we design novel Learning-to-Weight Modules (LWM) to combine features from the two streams, thereby enhancing the final forgery localization performance. To improve the training process, we propose a novel Pixel-Inconsistency Data Augmentation (PIDA) strategy, driving the model to focus on capturing inherent pixel-level artifacts instead of mining semantic forgery traces. This work establishes a comprehensive benchmark integrating 15 representative detection models across 12 datasets. Extensive experiments show that our method successfully extracts inherent pixel-inconsistency forgery fingerprints and achieve state-of-the-art generalization and robustness performances in image manipulation localization.

Chenqi Kong, Anwei Luo, Shiqi Wang, Haoliang Li, Anderson Rocha, Alex C. Kot• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image Forgery DetectionCocoGlide--
15
Image-level Forgery DetectionWeighted Avg
F1 Score67.59
11
Image-level Forgery DetectionCASIA v1
F1 Score74.99
11
Image-level Forgery DetectionKorus
F1 Score65.7
11
Image-level Forgery DetectionDSO
F166.9
11
Pixel-level Forgery LocalizationCASIA v1
F1 Score56.65
11
Image-level Forgery DetectionNIST16
F1 Score55.92
11
Image-level Forgery DetectionColumbia
F1 Score69.41
11
Image-level Forgery Detectionin the wild
F1 Score97.71
11
Pixel-level Forgery LocalizationCocoGlide
F1 Score40.47
11
Showing 10 of 26 rows

Other info

Follow for update