GreenMachine: Automatic Design of Zero-Cost Proxies for Energy-Efficient NAS
About
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has driven innovations and created new opportunities across various sectors. However, leveraging domain-specific knowledge often requires automated tools to design and configure models effectively. In the case of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), researchers and practitioners usually resort to Neural Architecture Search (NAS) approaches, which are resource- and time-intensive, requiring the training and evaluation of numerous candidate architectures. This raises sustainability concerns, particularly due to the high energy demands involved, creating a paradox: the pursuit of the most effective model can undermine sustainability goals. To mitigate this issue, zero-cost proxies have emerged as a promising alternative. These proxies estimate a model's performance without the need for full training, offering a more efficient approach. This paper addresses the challenges of model evaluation by automatically designing zero-cost proxies to assess DNNs efficiently. Our method begins with a randomly generated set of zero-cost proxies, which are evolved and tested using the NATS-Bench benchmark. We assess the proxies' effectiveness using both randomly sampled and stratified subsets of the search space, ensuring they can differentiate between low- and high-performing networks and enhance generalizability. Results show our method outperforms existing approaches on the stratified sampling strategy, achieving strong correlations with ground truth performance, including a Kendall correlation of 0.89 on CIFAR-10 and 0.77 on CIFAR-100 with NATS-Bench-SSS and a Kendall correlation of 0.78 on CIFAR-10 and 0.71 on CIFAR-100 with NATS-Bench-TSS.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture Performance Prediction | NATS-Bench SSS CIFAR-10 (stratified subset) | mAKCC88.8 | 24 | |
| Architecture Performance Prediction | NATS-Bench SSS ImageNet16-120 (stratified subset) | Mean Abs Kendall Corr Coeff85.6 | 24 | |
| Architecture Performance Prediction | NATS-Bench SSS CIFAR-100 (stratified subset) | mAKCC29.6 | 24 | |
| Architecture Performance Ranking | CIFAR-100 SSS NATS-Bench (non-stratified) | Mean Abs Spearman Correlation84.2 | 12 | |
| NAS Proxy Evaluation | NATS-Bench SSS (Size Search Space) CIFAR-10 stratified subset | Spearman Correlation (x100)98.2 | 12 | |
| NAS Proxy Evaluation | NATS-Bench SSS (Size Search Space) CIFAR-100 stratified subset | mAbs Spearman Correlation0.924 | 12 | |
| NAS Proxy Evaluation | NATS-Bench SSS (Size Search Space) ImageNet16-120 stratified subset | Mean Absolute Spearman Correlation Coefficient0.971 | 12 | |
| NAS Proxy Evaluation | NATS-Bench TSS (Topology Search Space) CIFAR-10 stratified | Mean Abs Spearman Correlation92.8 | 12 | |
| Architecture Performance Ranking | ImageNet16-120 SSS NATS-Bench (non-stratified) | Mean Absolute Spearman Correlation93.1 | 12 | |
| Architecture Performance Ranking | CIFAR-10 TSS NATS-Bench (non-stratified) | Mean Abs Spearman Correlation67.6 | 12 |