Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

IML-ViT: Benchmarking Image Manipulation Localization by Vision Transformer

About

Advanced image tampering techniques are increasingly challenging the trustworthiness of multimedia, leading to the development of Image Manipulation Localization (IML). But what makes a good IML model? The answer lies in the way to capture artifacts. Exploiting artifacts requires the model to extract non-semantic discrepancies between manipulated and authentic regions, necessitating explicit comparisons between the two areas. With the self-attention mechanism, naturally, the Transformer should be a better candidate to capture artifacts. However, due to limited datasets, there is currently no pure ViT-based approach for IML to serve as a benchmark, and CNNs dominate the entire task. Nevertheless, CNNs suffer from weak long-range and non-semantic modeling. To bridge this gap, based on the fact that artifacts are sensitive to image resolution, amplified under multi-scale features, and massive at the manipulation border, we formulate the answer to the former question as building a ViT with high-resolution capacity, multi-scale feature extraction capability, and manipulation edge supervision that could converge with a small amount of data. We term this simple but effective ViT paradigm IML-ViT, which has significant potential to become a new benchmark for IML. Extensive experiments on three different mainstream protocols verified our model outperforms the state-of-the-art manipulation localization methods. Code and models are available at https://github.com/SunnyHaze/IML-ViT.

Xiaochen Ma, Bo Du, Zhuohang Jiang, Xia Du, Ahmed Y. Al Hammadi, Jizhe Zhou• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Artifact DetectionOpenMMSec
Deepfake EFS76
68
Image Forgery DetectionForensicHub IFF-Protocol v2025 (test)
FF-c400.75
23
Image Manipulation LocalizationCocoGlide (test)
F1 Score44
18
Tamper LocalizationCOCO Stable Diffusion edited (test)
F1 Score21.3
14
Tamper LocalizationCOCO Splicing (test)
F1 Score35.2
14
Tamper LocalizationCOCO Stable Diffusion Inpaint (test)
F1 Score0.107
14
Tamper LocalizationCOCO Controlnet Inpaint (test)
F1 Score11.1
14
Image Forgery LocalizationNIST16 (test)
F1 Score32.6
12
Traditional Tampering LocalizationCASIA (test)
IoU67.5
8
Generative Image Tampering LocalizationGIT10K (test)
IoU88.2
8
Showing 10 of 16 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update