Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

VL-Uncertainty: Detecting Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Model via Uncertainty Estimation

About

Given the higher information load processed by large vision-language models (LVLMs) compared to single-modal LLMs, detecting LVLM hallucinations requires more human and time expense, and thus rise a wider safety concerns. In this paper, we introduce VL-Uncertainty, the first uncertainty-based framework for detecting hallucinations in LVLMs. Different from most existing methods that require ground-truth or pseudo annotations, VL-Uncertainty utilizes uncertainty as an intrinsic metric. We measure uncertainty by analyzing the prediction variance across semantically equivalent but perturbed prompts, including visual and textual data. When LVLMs are highly confident, they provide consistent responses to semantically equivalent queries. However, when uncertain, the responses of the target LVLM become more random. Considering semantically similar answers with different wordings, we cluster LVLM responses based on their semantic content and then calculate the cluster distribution entropy as the uncertainty measure to detect hallucination. Our extensive experiments on 10 LVLMs across four benchmarks, covering both free-form and multi-choice tasks, show that VL-Uncertainty significantly outperforms strong baseline methods in hallucination detection.

Ruiyang Zhang, Hu Zhang, Zhedong Zheng• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Binary safety hallucination detectionEndoVis18-VQA Out-of-template (val)
Accuracy85
50
Self-evaluationViLP
AUROC67.4
36
Self-evaluationMMVet
AUROC0.859
36
Self-evaluationVisualCoT
AUROC77.7
36
Self-evaluationCVBench
AUROC0.72
36
Binary safety hallucination detectionPitVQA (External val)
Accuracy93
25
Binary safety hallucination detectionEndoVis VQA In-template 18 (val)
Accuracy98
25
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update