Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

A Simple Data Augmentation for Feature Distribution Skewed Federated Learning

About

Federated Learning (FL) facilitates collaborative learning among multiple clients in a distributed manner and ensures the security of privacy. However, its performance inevitably degrades with non-Independent and Identically Distributed (non-IID) data. In this paper, we focus on the feature distribution skewed FL scenario, a common non-IID situation in real-world applications where data from different clients exhibit varying underlying distributions. This variation leads to feature shift, which is a key issue of this scenario. While previous works have made notable progress, few pay attention to the data itself, i.e., the root of this issue. The primary goal of this paper is to mitigate feature shift from the perspective of data. To this end, we propose a simple yet remarkably effective input-level data augmentation method, namely FedRDN, which randomly injects the statistical information of the local distribution from the entire federation into the client's data. This is beneficial to improve the generalization of local feature representations, thereby mitigating feature shift. Moreover, our FedRDN is a plug-and-play component, which can be seamlessly integrated into the data augmentation flow with only a few lines of code. Extensive experiments on several datasets show that the performance of various representative FL methods can be further improved by integrating our FedRDN, demonstrating its effectiveness, strong compatibility and generalizability. Code will be released.

Yunlu Yan, Huazhu Fu, Yuexiang Li, Jinheng Xie, Jun Ma, Guang Yang, Lei Zhu• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationDomainNet (test)
Average Accuracy61.01
266
Image ClassificationDomainNet
Accuracy (ClipArt)40.15
238
Image ClassificationF-MNIST (test)
Accuracy66.15
156
Image ClassificationCIFAR100 (test)
Accuracy64.93
98
Image ClassificationOffice-Caltech-10 (test)
Average Accuracy65.54
58
Image ClassificationISIC (test)
Accuracy56.12
24
Image ClassificationHAM10000 (test)
Accuracy60.23
24
Image ClassificationCIFAR10 Non-IID 1
Accuracy56.89
20
Image ClassificationOffice10
Mean Accuracy61.97
14
Image ClassificationISIC Uniform
Accuracy73.58
12
Showing 10 of 25 rows

Other info

Follow for update