Jointly Modeling Inter- & Intra-Modality Dependencies for Multi-modal Learning
About
Supervised multi-modal learning involves mapping multiple modalities to a target label. Previous studies in this field have concentrated on capturing in isolation either the inter-modality dependencies (the relationships between different modalities and the label) or the intra-modality dependencies (the relationships within a single modality and the label). We argue that these conventional approaches that rely solely on either inter- or intra-modality dependencies may not be optimal in general. We view the multi-modal learning problem from the lens of generative models where we consider the target as a source of multiple modalities and the interaction between them. Towards that end, we propose inter- & intra-modality modeling (I2M2) framework, which captures and integrates both the inter- and intra-modality dependencies, leading to more accurate predictions. We evaluate our approach using real-world healthcare and vision-and-language datasets with state-of-the-art models, demonstrating superior performance over traditional methods focusing only on one type of modality dependency.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classification | AV-MNIST | Accuracy72.38 | 46 | |
| Multimodal Action Recognition | UCF101 | Accuracy80.02 | 23 | |
| Natural Language Visual Reasoning | NLVR2 (test) | Accuracy85.36 | 16 | |
| Multimodal Emotion Recognition | CREMA-D | Accuracy74.13 | 14 | |
| Multimodal Action Recognition | Kinetic-Sounds (KS) | Accuracy (ACC)85.07 | 14 | |
| Sentiment Analysis | CMU-MOSEI | ACC79.85 | 13 | |
| Multimodal Action Recognition | Kinetic-Sounds ViT | Accuracy68.93 | 13 | |
| ICD-9 code prediction | MIMIC-III v1.4 (test) | Accuracy (140-239)91.58 | 5 | |
| Mortality Prediction | MIMIC-III v1.4 (test) | Accuracy78.1 | 5 | |
| Visual Question Answering | VQA-VS (IID) | VQA Score68.63 | 5 |