Fairness Shields: Safeguarding against Biased Decision Makers
About
As AI-based decision-makers increasingly influence human lives, it is a growing concern that their decisions are often unfair or biased with respect to people's sensitive attributes, such as gender and race. Most existing bias prevention measures provide probabilistic fairness guarantees in the long run, and it is possible that the decisions are biased on specific instances of short decision sequences. We introduce fairness shielding, where a symbolic decision-maker -- the fairness shield -- continuously monitors the sequence of decisions of another deployed black-box decision-maker, and makes interventions so that a given fairness criterion is met while the total intervention costs are minimized. We present four different algorithms for computing fairness shields, among which one guarantees fairness over fixed horizons, and three guarantee fairness periodically after fixed intervals. Given a distribution over future decisions and their intervention costs, our algorithms solve different instances of bounded-horizon optimal control problems with different levels of computational costs and optimality guarantees. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of these shields in ensuring fairness while maintaining cost efficiency across various scenarios.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fairness-aware Classification | COMPAS Race (test) | DP3.3 | 14 | |
| Fair Decision Making | Adult Income Race 11 (test) | Total Interventions5.8 | 9 | |
| Fair Decision Making | Adult Income Gender 11 (test) | Total Interventions1.6 | 9 | |
| Fair Decision Making | German Credit Gender 30 (test) | Total Interventions16.2 | 9 | |
| Fair Decision Making | German Credit Age 30 (test) | Total Number of Interventions7.4 | 9 | |
| Fair Decision Making | COMPAS Gender 34 (test) | Total Interventions32.6 | 9 | |
| Group Fairness | German Credit Gender | Demographic Parity0.038 | 9 | |
| Group Fairness | Adult Income Race | Demographic Parity0.016 | 9 | |
| Group Fairness | Adult Income Gender | Demographic Parity0.009 | 9 | |
| Group Fairness | COMPAS Gender | Demographic Parity1.9 | 9 |