Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Models

About

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have led to significant breakthroughs in mathematical reasoning capabilities. However, existing benchmarks like GSM8K or MATH are now being solved with high accuracy (e.g., OpenAI o1 achieves 94.8\% on MATH dataset), indicating their inadequacy for truly challenging these models. To bridge this gap, we propose a comprehensive and challenging benchmark specifically designed to assess LLMs' mathematical reasoning at the Olympiad level. Unlike existing Olympiad-related benchmarks, our dataset focuses exclusively on mathematics and comprises a vast collection of 4428 competition-level problems with rigorous human annotation. These problems are meticulously categorized into over 33 sub-domains and span more than 10 distinct difficulty levels, enabling a holistic assessment of model performance in Olympiad-mathematical reasoning. Furthermore, we conducted an in-depth analysis based on this benchmark. Our experimental results show that even the most advanced models, OpenAI o1-mini and OpenAI o1-preview, struggle with highly challenging Olympiad-level problems, with 60.54\% and 52.55\% accuracy, highlighting significant challenges in Olympiad-level mathematical reasoning.

Bofei Gao, Feifan Song, Zhe Yang, Zefan Cai, Yibo Miao, Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Chenghao Ma, Liang Chen, Runxin Xu, Zhengyang Tang, Benyou Wang, Daoguang Zan, Shanghaoran Quan, Ge Zhang, Lei Sha, Yichang Zhang, Xuancheng Ren, Tianyu Liu, Baobao Chang• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Verifiable JudgingVerifyBench (full)
Accuracy80.2
19
Verifiable JudgingVerifyBench Hard
Accuracy67.7
19
LLM Judging AgreementReasoning Agreement Benchmark 2,500 samples
Parsing Success Rate100
15
LLM Judging AgreementReasoning Agreement Benchmark 500-sample human-annotated
Cohen's Kappa0.81
15
Reasoning Correctness EvaluationGSM8K
Average False Positive Rate8.5
12
Reasoning Correctness EvaluationAIME 1983–2024
Average False Positive Rate3.7
12
Reasoning Correctness EvaluationNaturalReasoning
Average FPR16.1
12
Reasoning Correctness EvaluationMATH
Average FPR23.4
12
Reasoning Correctness EvaluationRLVR Multi-subject
Average FPR (%)19.6
12
MathematicsAIME 2024, OmniMath, OlympiadBench, AMC 22-24, MATH-500
CBRC Score0.76
5
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update