Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Detecting and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Fine-Grained AI Feedback

About

The rapidly developing Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have shown notable capabilities on a range of multi-modal tasks, but still face the hallucination phenomena where the generated texts do not align with the given contexts, significantly restricting the usages of LVLMs. Most previous work detects and mitigates hallucination at the coarse-grained level or requires expensive annotation (e.g., labeling by proprietary models or human experts). To address these issues, we propose detecting and mitigating hallucinations in LVLMs via fine-grained AI feedback. The basic idea is that we generate a small-size sentence-level hallucination annotation dataset by proprietary models, whereby we train a hallucination detection model which can perform sentence-level hallucination detection, covering primary hallucination types (i.e., object, attribute, and relationship). Then, we propose a detect-then-rewrite pipeline to automatically construct preference dataset for training hallucination mitigating model. Furthermore, we propose differentiating the severity of hallucinations, and introducing a Hallucination Severity-Aware Direct Preference Optimization (HSA-DPO) for mitigating hallucination in LVLMs by incorporating the severity of hallucinations into preference learning. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

Wenyi Xiao, Ziwei Huang, Leilei Gan, Wanggui He, Haoyuan Li, Zhelun Yu, Fangxun Shu, Hao Jiang, Linchao Zhu• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
Accuracy60.4
1455
Multimodal Capability EvaluationMM-Vet
Score35
429
Hallucination EvaluationMMHal-Bench
MMHal Score2.61
309
Hallucination EvaluationAMBER
CHAIR2.8
267
Multimodal EvaluationMMStar
Accuracy34.5
177
Hallucination EvaluationHallusionBench--
153
Multimodal Visual PerceptionMMVP
Accuracy33.3
106
Hallucination EvaluationObject-HalBench
CHAIR Score (s)5.3
78
Hallucination and Visual Reasoning EvaluationHallusionBench
Accuracy (aACC)46.1
61
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2
Overall Accuracy79.2
45
Showing 10 of 18 rows

Other info

Follow for update