Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Safe LoRA: the Silver Lining of Reducing Safety Risks when Fine-tuning Large Language Models

About

While large language models (LLMs) such as Llama-2 or GPT-4 have shown impressive zero-shot performance, fine-tuning is still necessary to enhance their performance for customized datasets, domain-specific tasks, or other private needs. However, fine-tuning all parameters of LLMs requires significant hardware resources, which can be impractical for typical users. Therefore, parameter-efficient fine-tuning such as LoRA have emerged, allowing users to fine-tune LLMs without the need for considerable computing resources, with little performance degradation compared to fine-tuning all parameters. Unfortunately, recent studies indicate that fine-tuning can increase the risk to the safety of LLMs, even when data does not contain malicious content. To address this challenge, we propose Safe LoRA, a simple one-liner patch to the original LoRA implementation by introducing the projection of LoRA weights from selected layers to the safety-aligned subspace, effectively reducing the safety risks in LLM fine-tuning while maintaining utility. It is worth noting that Safe LoRA is a training-free and data-free approach, as it only requires the knowledge of the weights from the base and aligned LLMs. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that when fine-tuning on purely malicious data, Safe LoRA retains similar safety performance as the original aligned model. Moreover, when the fine-tuning dataset contains a mixture of both benign and malicious data, Safe LoRA mitigates the negative effect made by malicious data while preserving performance on downstream tasks. Our codes are available at \url{https://github.com/IBM/SafeLoRA}.

Chia-Yi Hsu, Yu-Lin Tsai, Chih-Hsun Lin, Pin-Yu Chen, Chia-Mu Yu, Chun-Ying Huang• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Code GenerationHumanEval
Pass@111.89
1048
Mathematical ReasoningGSM8K (test)
Accuracy22.61
954
Instruction FollowingIFEval--
854
Instruction FollowingAlpacaEval--
423
Multitask Language UnderstandingMMLU
Accuracy68.6
263
Question AnsweringBoolQ
Accuracy86.97
233
Text ClassificationAGNews
Accuracy82.9
161
Safety EvaluationHarmBench
ASR13.6
153
Safety EvaluationHexPhi
Harmfulness5
140
Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingMMLU
Accuracy55.1
137
Showing 10 of 74 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update