Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Improving Synthetic Image Detection Towards Generalization: An Image Transformation Perspective

About

With recent generative models facilitating photo-realistic image synthesis, the proliferation of synthetic images has also engendered certain negative impacts on social platforms, thereby raising an urgent imperative to develop effective detectors. Current synthetic image detection (SID) pipelines are primarily dedicated to crafting universal artifact features, accompanied by an oversight about SID training paradigm. In this paper, we re-examine the SID problem and identify two prevalent biases in current training paradigms, i.e., weakened artifact features and overfitted artifact features. Meanwhile, we discover that the imaging mechanism of synthetic images contributes to heightened local correlations among pixels, suggesting that detectors should be equipped with local awareness. In this light, we propose SAFE, a lightweight and effective detector with three simple image transformations. Firstly, for weakened artifact features, we substitute the down-sampling operator with the crop operator in image pre-processing to help circumvent artifact distortion. Secondly, for overfitted artifact features, we include ColorJitter and RandomRotation as additional data augmentations, to help alleviate irrelevant biases from color discrepancies and semantic differences in limited training samples. Thirdly, for local awareness, we propose a patch-based random masking strategy tailored for SID, forcing the detector to focus on local regions at training. Comparative experiments are conducted on an open-world dataset, comprising synthetic images generated by 26 distinct generative models. Our pipeline achieves a new state-of-the-art performance, with remarkable improvements of 4.5% in accuracy and 2.9% in average precision against existing methods. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Ouxiang-Li/SAFE.

Ouxiang Li, Jiayin Cai, Yanbin Hao, Xiaolong Jiang, Yao Hu, Fuli Feng• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Generated Image DetectionGenImage (test)
Average Accuracy95.5
103
AI-generated image detectionGenImage--
65
AI-generated image detectionChameleon
Accuracy56.8
63
AI-generated image detectionChameleon (test)
Accuracy59.2
54
Synthetic Image DetectionForenSynths (test)
Mean Accuracy96.2
31
AIGI DetectionBFree Online
B.Acc50.5
23
AIGI DetectionDRCT-2M
B.Acc59.3
23
AI-generated image detectionDDPM generator (test)
Accuracy89.4
22
AI-generated image detectionChameleon In-the-wild
Real Accuracy99.3
18
AI-generated image detectionCommunityAI (In-the-wild)
Real Accuracy98.4
18
Showing 10 of 81 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update