Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Large Language Models for Market Research: A Data-augmentation Approach

About

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed artificial intelligence by excelling in complex natural language processing tasks. Their ability to generate human-like text has opened new possibilities for market research, particularly in conjoint analysis, where understanding consumer preferences is essential but often resource-intensive. Traditional survey-based methods face limitations in scalability and cost, making LLM-generated data a promising alternative. However, while LLMs have the potential to simulate real consumer behavior, recent studies highlight a significant gap between LLM-generated and human data, with biases introduced when substituting between the two. In this paper, we address this gap by proposing a novel statistical data augmentation approach that efficiently integrates LLM-generated data with real data in conjoint analysis. This results in statistically robust estimators with consistent and asymptotically normal properties, in contrast to naive approaches that simply substitute human data with LLM-generated data, which can exacerbate bias. We further present a finite-sample performance bound on the estimation error. We validate our framework through an empirical study on COVID-19 vaccine preferences, demonstrating its superior ability to reduce estimation error and save data and costs by 24.9% to 79.8%. In contrast, naive approaches fail to save data due to the inherent biases in LLM-generated data compared to human data. Another empirical study on sports car choices validates the robustness of our results. Our findings suggest that while LLM-generated data is not a direct substitute for human responses, it can serve as a valuable complement when used within a robust statistical framework.

Mengxin Wang, Dennis J. Zhang, Heng Zhang• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Data Size SavingEmpirical Setting I
Data Size Saving (%)77.7
40
Bias Reduction EstimationCOVID-19 vaccine preference dataset m=50 samples
Beta (A)36.81
20
Bias Reduction EstimationCOVID-19 vaccine preference dataset m=150 samples
Beta (A)54.13
20
Survey SimulationESS 9
Wasserstein Distance (WD)0.132
16
Survey SimulationCFPS
Weighted Distance (WD)0.12
16
Survey SimulationESS11
Weighted Distance (WD)0.125
16
Survey SimulationCGSS
Weighted Distance (WD)0.117
16
Survey SimulationWVS
Weighted Distance (WD)0.13
16
Bias Reduction EstimationPrivate Healthcare Census Setting
Average MAPE Difference-65.86
15
Data size saving estimationSports car dataset Empirical Setting II, m=50
Data Size Saving (%)60.29
10
Showing 10 of 25 rows

Other info

Follow for update