Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

LOHA: Direct Graph Spectral Contrastive Learning Between Low-pass and High-pass Views

About

Spectral Graph Neural Networks effectively handle graphs with different homophily levels, with low-pass filter mining feature smoothness and high-pass filter capturing differences. When these distinct filters could naturally form two opposite views for self-supervised learning, the commonalities between the counterparts for the same node remain unexplored, leading to suboptimal performance. In this paper, a simple yet effective self-supervised contrastive framework, LOHA, is proposed to address this gap. LOHA optimally leverages low-pass and high-pass views by embracing "harmony in diversity". Rather than solely maximizing the difference between these distinct views, which may lead to feature separation, LOHA harmonizes the diversity by treating the propagation of graph signals from both views as a composite feature. Specifically, a novel high-dimensional feature named spectral signal trend is proposed to serve as the basis for the composite feature, which remains relatively unaffected by changing filters and focuses solely on original feature differences. LOHA achieves an average performance improvement of 2.8% over runner-up models on 9 real-world datasets with varying homophily levels. Notably, LOHA even surpasses fully-supervised models on several datasets, which underscores the potential of LOHA in advancing the efficacy of spectral GNNs for diverse graph structures.

Ziyun Zou, Yinghui Jiang, Lian Shen, Juan Liu, Xiangrong Liu• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationCiteseer
Accuracy71.95
931
Node ClassificationCora (test)
Mean Accuracy81.22
861
Node ClassificationCiteseer (test)
Accuracy0.7195
824
Node ClassificationPubmed
Accuracy78.09
819
Node ClassificationChameleon
Accuracy45.45
640
Node ClassificationWisconsin
Accuracy77.05
627
Node ClassificationTexas
Accuracy0.6973
616
Node ClassificationSquirrel
Accuracy34.46
591
Node ClassificationCornell
Accuracy55.35
582
Node ClassificationActor
Accuracy34.19
397
Showing 10 of 18 rows

Other info

Follow for update