Deliberative Alignment: Reasoning Enables Safer Language Models
About
As large-scale language models increasingly impact safety-critical domains, ensuring their reliable adherence to well-defined principles remains a fundamental challenge. We introduce Deliberative Alignment, a new paradigm that directly teaches the model safety specifications and trains it to explicitly recall and accurately reason over the specifications before answering. We used this approach to align OpenAI's o-series models, and achieved highly precise adherence to OpenAI's safety policies, without requiring human-written chain-of-thoughts or answers. Deliberative Alignment pushes the Pareto frontier by simultaneously increasing robustness to jailbreaks while decreasing overrefusal rates, and also improves out-of-distribution generalization. We demonstrate that reasoning over explicitly specified policies enables more scalable, trustworthy, and interpretable alignment.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jailbreak Defense | PAIR | ASR18 | 97 | |
| Over-refusal | Over-refusal XSTest and OKTest | Over-refusal Accuracy (XSTest)97.2 | 12 | |
| Jailbreak Robustness | AdvBench w/o attack (original) | ASR0.00e+0 | 9 | |
| Jailbreak Robustness | PAIR v1 (test) | Compliance Rate11.2 | 9 | |
| Safety Evaluation | BeaverTail v1 (eval) | Compliance Rate4.8 | 9 | |
| Jailbreak Robustness | AdvBench AdvReasoning (original) | ASR58 | 9 | |
| Jailbreak Robustness | WildJailbreak (eval) | Compliance Rate42.5 | 9 | |
| Safety Evaluation | Malicious Instruct v1 (test) | Compliance Rate1 | 9 | |
| Safety Evaluation | XSTest Safe v1 | Accuracy88.8 | 9 | |
| Jailbreak Robustness | JailbreakV v1 (test) | Compliance Rate0.00e+0 | 9 |