Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Unlearning Clients, Features and Samples in Vertical Federated Learning

About

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a prominent distributed learning paradigm. Within the scope of privacy preservation, information privacy regulations such as GDPR entitle users to request the removal (or unlearning) of their contribution from a service that is hosting the model. For this purpose, a server hosting an ML model must be able to unlearn certain information in cases such as copyright infringement or security issues that can make the model vulnerable or impact the performance of a service based on that model. While most unlearning approaches in FL focus on Horizontal FL (HFL), where clients share the feature space and the global model, Vertical FL (VFL) has received less attention from the research community. VFL involves clients (passive parties) sharing the sample space among them while not having access to the labels. In this paper, we explore unlearning in VFL from three perspectives: unlearning clients, unlearning features, and unlearning samples. To unlearn clients and features we introduce VFU-KD which is based on knowledge distillation (KD) while to unlearn samples, VFU-GA is introduced which is based on gradient ascent. To provide evidence of approximate unlearning, we utilize Membership Inference Attack (MIA) to audit the effectiveness of our unlearning approach. Our experiments across six tabular datasets and two image datasets demonstrate that VFU-KD and VFU-GA achieve performance comparable to or better than both retraining from scratch and the benchmark R2S method in many cases, with improvements of $(0-2\%)$. In the remaining cases, utility scores remain comparable, with a modest utility loss ranging from $1-5\%$. Unlike existing methods, VFU-KD and VFU-GA require no communication between active and passive parties during unlearning. However, they do require the active party to store the previously communicated embeddings.

Ayush K. Varshney, Konstantinos Vandikas, Vicen\c{c} Torra• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Membership Inference AttackCIFAR10
Balanced Accuracy66.6
19
Vertical Federated UnlearningCIFAR-10
Clean Accuracy59.61
7
Vertical Federated UnlearningSVHN
Clean Accuracy61.15
7
Vertical Federated UnlearningCIFAR-100
Clean Accuracy25.68
7
Vertical Federated UnlearningMNIST
Clean Accuracy87.67
7
Vertical Federated UnlearningFashion MNIST
Clean Accuracy86.19
7
Membership Inference AttackCIFAR-100--
6
Membership Inference AttackMNIST
AUC0.887
5
Membership Inference AttackFashion MNIST
AUC0.742
5
Membership Inference AttackSVHN
AUC0.755
5
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update