Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Efficient Reasoning with Hidden Thinking

About

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has become a powerful framework for improving complex problem-solving capabilities in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). However, the verbose nature of textual reasoning introduces significant inefficiencies. In this work, we propose Heima (as hidden llama), an effective CoT compression framework that condenses lengthy CoTs into a small set of abstract thinking tokens, preserving essential reasoning while removing redundancy. We then conduct a theoretical analysis from an information-theoretic perspective, quantifying the information gap induced by compression, showing that reasoning capability is preserved when non-trivial mutual information is retained. To further explore and quantify this information gap, we design the adaptive interpreter that maps thinking tokens back to variable-length textual sequences, thereby reconstructing the reasoning process. Experiments across diverse reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that Heima improves reasoning efficiency, while maintaining or even achieving better zero-shot accuracy. Moreover, the interpreter reconstructs coherent reasoning progresses from compressed thinking tokens, revealing that the information gap is minimal and validating the effectiveness of the proposed framework. This work paves the way for scalable latent reasoning models and advances our understanding of efficient reasoning processes in large models. Code: https://github.com/shawnricecake/Heima

Xuan Shen, Yizhou Wang, Yufa Zhou, Xiangxi Shi, Pu Zhao, Yanzhi Wang, Jiuxiang Gu• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Science Question AnsweringScienceQA
Accuracy71.5
916
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2
Accuracy74.3
257
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2 (test)--
142
Science Question AnsweringScienceQA (test)
Steps4.5
8
Multimodal Visual Pattern Question AnsweringMMVP
Accuracy59.8
8
Multimodal Spatial ReasoningV-Star
Accuracy41.7
8
Multimodal Spatial ReasoningWinoground
Accuracy65.64
8
Multimodal Spatial ReasoningVSR
Accuracy51.69
8
Multimodal Spatial ReasoningEmbSpatial
Accuracy54.66
8
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update