Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

The Relationship between No-Regret Learning and Online Conformal Prediction

About

Existing algorithms for online conformal prediction -- guaranteeing marginal coverage in adversarial settings -- are variants of online gradient descent (OGD), but their analyses of worst-case coverage do not follow from the regret guarantee of OGD. What is the relationship between no-regret learning and online conformal prediction? We observe that although standard regret guarantees imply marginal coverage in i.i.d. settings, this connection fails as soon as we either move to adversarial environments or ask for group conditional coverage. On the other hand, we show a tight connection between threshold calibrated coverage and swap-regret in adversarial settings, which extends to group-conditional (multi-valid) coverage. We also show that algorithms in the follow the perturbed leader family of no regret learning algorithms (which includes online gradient descent) can be used to give group-conditional coverage guarantees in adversarial settings for arbitrary grouping functions. Via this connection we analyze and conduct experiments using a multi-group generalization of the ACI algorithm of Gibbs & Candes [2021] (arXiv:2106.00170).

Ramya Ramalingam, Shayan Kiyani, Aaron Roth• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Group-conditional Online Conformal PredictionDelta (DAL) stock
Lowest Coverage88.9
3
Group-conditional Online Conformal PredictionMIMIC IV
Lowest Coverage89.8
3
Online Conformal PredictionOnline Conformal Prediction (OCP)
Coverage Rate100
1
Showing 3 of 3 rows

Other info

Follow for update