Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

APOLLO: SGD-like Memory, AdamW-level Performance

About

Large language models (LLMs) are notoriously memory-intensive during training, particularly with the popular AdamW optimizer. This memory burden necessitates using more or higher-end GPUs or reducing batch sizes, limiting training scalability and throughput. To address this, various memory-efficient optimizers have been proposed to reduce optimizer memory usage. However, they face critical challenges: (i) reliance on costly SVD operations; (ii) significant performance trade-offs compared to AdamW; and (iii) still substantial optimizer memory overhead to maintain competitive performance. In this work, we identify that AdamW's learning rate adaptation rule can be effectively coarsened as a structured learning rate update. Based on this insight, we propose Approximated Gradient Scaling for Memory-Efficient LLM Optimization (APOLLO), which approximates learning rate scaling using an auxiliary low-rank optimizer state based on pure random projection. This structured learning rate update rule makes APOLLO highly tolerant to further memory reductions while delivering comparable pre-training performance. Even its rank-1 variant, APOLLO-Mini, achieves superior pre-training performance compared to AdamW with SGD-level memory costs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the APOLLO series performs on-par with or better than AdamW, while achieving greater memory savings by nearly eliminating the optimization states of AdamW. These savings provide significant system-level benefits: (1) Enhanced Throughput: 3x throughput on an 8xA100-80GB setup compared to AdamW by supporting 4x larger batch sizes. (2) Improved Model Scalability: Pre-training LLaMA-13B with naive DDP on A100-80GB GPUs without system-level optimizations. (3) Low-End GPU Friendly Pre-training: Pre-training LLaMA-7B on a single GPU using less than 12 GB of memory with weight quantization.

Hanqing Zhu, Zhenyu Zhang, Wenyan Cong, Xi Liu, Sem Park, Vikas Chandra, Bo Long, David Z. Pan, Zhangyang Wang, Jinwon Lee• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Language ModelingC4 (val)
PPL12.97
737
Instruction FollowingMT-Bench
MT-Bench Score6.6
287
Natural Language UnderstandingGLUE (val)
SST-293.57
201
Mathematical ReasoningAQUA
Accuracy45.6
167
Multitask Language UnderstandingMMLU (val)
Accuracy73.77
94
Natural Language UnderstandingSuperGLUE (test)
BoolQ Accuracy86.5
74
Language ModelingThe Pile (test)
PPL (The Pile Test)39.54
53
Language ModelingC4 (train)--
50
LLM PretrainingC4
Perplexity13.48
47
Language Model Pre-trainingC4 Llama 2 pre-training (val)
Perplexity14.2
47
Showing 10 of 27 rows

Other info

Follow for update