Merging LoRAs like Playing LEGO: Pushing the Modularity of LoRA to Extremes Through Rank-Wise Clustering
About
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as a popular technique for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) to various domains due to its modular design and widespread availability on platforms like Huggingface. This modularity has sparked interest in combining multiple LoRAs to enhance LLM capabilities. However, existing methods for LoRA composition primarily focus on task-specific adaptations that require additional training, and current model merging techniques often fail to fully leverage LoRA's modular nature, leading to parameter interference and performance degradation. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of disassembling and reassembling multiple LoRAs at a finer granularity, analogous to assembling LEGO blocks. We introduce the concept of Minimal Semantic Units (MSUs), where the parameters corresponding to each rank in LoRA function as independent units. These MSUs demonstrate permutation invariance and concatenation-summation equivalence properties, enabling flexible combinations to create new LoRAs. Building on these insights, we propose the LoRA-LEGO framework. This framework conducts rank-wise parameter clustering by grouping MSUs from different LoRAs into $k$ clusters. The centroid of each cluster serves as a representative MSU, enabling the assembly of a merged LoRA with an adjusted rank of $k$. Additionally, we apply a dual reweighting strategy to optimize the scale of the merged LoRA. Experiments across various benchmarks demonstrate that our method outperforms existing approaches in LoRA merging.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Question Answering | ChartQA | -- | 371 | |
| Image Captioning | COCO | -- | 130 | |
| Natural Language Inference | QNLI | -- | 61 | |
| Visual Question Answering | IconQA | Top-1 Acc53.1 | 57 | |
| Continual Learning | Standard CL Benchmark | Avg Final Acc0.684 | 50 | |
| Continual Learning | Large Number of Tasks | Average Performance56.9 | 50 | |
| Visual Question Answering | DocVQA (val) | ANLS82.5 | 47 | |
| Image Classification | DTD | Average Accuracy62.9 | 19 | |
| Image Classification | EuroSAT | Average Accuracy62.9 | 19 | |
| Multi-task Dense Prediction | Pascal Context (test) | Normal Error55.4 | 18 |