Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Capability Instruction Tuning: A New Paradigm for Dynamic LLM Routing

About

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated human-like instruction-following abilities, particularly those exceeding 100 billion parameters. The combined capability of some smaller, resource-friendly LLMs can address most of the instructions that larger LLMs excel at. In this work, we explore how to route the best-performing LLM for each instruction to achieve better overall performance. We develop a new paradigm, constructing capability instructions with model capability representation, user instruction, and performance inquiry prompts to assess the performance. To learn from capability instructions, we introduce a new end-to-end framework called Model Selection with Aptitude Test (Model-SAT), which generates positive and negative samples based on what different models perform well or struggle with. Model-SAT uses a model capability encoder that extends its model representation to a lightweight LLM. Our experiments show that Model-SAT understands the performance dimensions of candidate models and provides the probabilities of their capability to handle various instructions. Additionally, during deployment, a new model can quickly infer its aptitude test results across 50 tasks, each with 20 shots. Model-SAT performs state-of-the-art model routing without candidate inference and in real-world new model-released scenarios. The code is available at https://github.com/Now-Join-Us/CIT-LLM-Routing

Yi-Kai Zhang, De-Chuan Zhan, Han-Jia Ye• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multi-discipline Knowledge EvaluationCodaSet ID MMLU-PRO (test)
Accuracy81.82
16
Mathematical ReasoningMath_500 CodaSet OOD (test)
Accuracy (%)81.98
16
Code GenerationMBPP CodaSet OOD (test)
Performance (%)74.6
16
Holistic EvaluationCodaSet ID Average (test)
Accuracy87.5
16
Symbolic and Logical ReasoningCodaSet BBH ID (test)
Accuracy92.16
16
General Language ModelingCodaSet OOD Average (test)
Performance (%)83.6
16
Instruction FollowingCodaSet ID IFEVAL (test)
Accuracy85.41
16
Mathematical ReasoningCodaSet ID GSM8k (test)
Accuracy0.906
16
Multi-turn Dialogue EvaluationMT_Bench CodaSet OOD (test)
Performance (%)94.21
16
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update