Capability Instruction Tuning: A New Paradigm for Dynamic LLM Routing
About
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated human-like instruction-following abilities, particularly those exceeding 100 billion parameters. The combined capability of some smaller, resource-friendly LLMs can address most of the instructions that larger LLMs excel at. In this work, we explore how to route the best-performing LLM for each instruction to achieve better overall performance. We develop a new paradigm, constructing capability instructions with model capability representation, user instruction, and performance inquiry prompts to assess the performance. To learn from capability instructions, we introduce a new end-to-end framework called Model Selection with Aptitude Test (Model-SAT), which generates positive and negative samples based on what different models perform well or struggle with. Model-SAT uses a model capability encoder that extends its model representation to a lightweight LLM. Our experiments show that Model-SAT understands the performance dimensions of candidate models and provides the probabilities of their capability to handle various instructions. Additionally, during deployment, a new model can quickly infer its aptitude test results across 50 tasks, each with 20 shots. Model-SAT performs state-of-the-art model routing without candidate inference and in real-world new model-released scenarios. The code is available at https://github.com/Now-Join-Us/CIT-LLM-Routing
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-discipline Knowledge Evaluation | CodaSet ID MMLU-PRO (test) | Accuracy81.82 | 16 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | Math_500 CodaSet OOD (test) | Accuracy (%)81.98 | 16 | |
| Code Generation | MBPP CodaSet OOD (test) | Performance (%)74.6 | 16 | |
| Holistic Evaluation | CodaSet ID Average (test) | Accuracy87.5 | 16 | |
| Symbolic and Logical Reasoning | CodaSet BBH ID (test) | Accuracy92.16 | 16 | |
| General Language Modeling | CodaSet OOD Average (test) | Performance (%)83.6 | 16 | |
| Instruction Following | CodaSet ID IFEVAL (test) | Accuracy85.41 | 16 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | CodaSet ID GSM8k (test) | Accuracy0.906 | 16 | |
| Multi-turn Dialogue Evaluation | MT_Bench CodaSet OOD (test) | Performance (%)94.21 | 16 |