Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

MLLM can see? Dynamic Correction Decoding for Hallucination Mitigation

About

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) frequently exhibit hallucination phenomena, but the underlying reasons remain poorly understood. In this paper, we present an empirical analysis and find that, although MLLMs incorrectly generate the objects in the final output, they are actually able to recognize visual objects in the preceding layers. We speculate that this may be due to the strong knowledge priors of the language model suppressing the visual information, leading to hallucinations. Motivated by this, we propose a novel dynamic correction decoding method for MLLMs DeCo, which adaptively selects the appropriate preceding layers and proportionally integrates knowledge into the final layer to adjust the output logits. Note that DeCo is model agnostic and can be seamlessly incorporated with various classic decoding strategies and applied to different MLLMs. We evaluate DeCo on widely-used benchmarks, demonstrating that it can reduce hallucination rates by a large margin compared to baselines, highlighting its potential to mitigate hallucinations. Code is available at https://github.com/zjunlp/DeCo.

Chenxi Wang, Xiang Chen, Ningyu Zhang, Bozhong Tian, Haoming Xu, Shumin Deng, Huajun Chen• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE--
2056
Multimodal UnderstandingMMMU
Accuracy57.2
437
Object HallucinationPOPE Popular
Accuracy87.72
406
Object HallucinationPOPE Adversarial
Accuracy83.18
367
Object HallucinationPOPE (Random)
F1 Score91.98
338
Hallucination EvaluationMMHal-Bench
MMHal Score2.75
309
Hallucination EvaluationPOPE--
281
Hallucination EvaluationAMBER
CHAIR5.8
267
Multimodal ReasoningMMMU
Accuracy62.5
220
Object Hallucination EvaluationCHAIR
CHAIRi Score12.6
174
Showing 10 of 73 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update