Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Mitigating Object Hallucination in MLLMs via Data-augmented Phrase-level Alignment

About

Despite their significant advancements, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often generate factually inaccurate information, referred to as hallucination. In this work, we address object hallucinations in MLLMs, where information is generated about an object not present in the input image. We introduce Data-augmented Phrase-level Alignment (DPA), a novel loss which can be applied to instruction-tuned off-the-shelf MLLMs to mitigate hallucinations, while preserving their general vision-language capabilities. To fine-tune MLLMs with DPA, we first generate a set of `hallucinated' and `correct' response pairs through generative data augmentation by selectively altering the ground-truth information of the correct responses at a phrase level. The DPA loss is then used to train MLLMs to reduce the likelihood of hallucinated phrases compared to the correct ones. Our thorough evaluation on various benchmarks confirms the effectiveness of DPA in mitigating hallucination while retaining the out-of-the-box performance of the MLLMs on general tasks. For instance, MLLMs finetuned with DPA, which we refer to as Hallucination Attenuated Language and Vision Assistant (HALVA), improve F1 by up to 13.4% on hallucination visual question-answering and reduce the hallucination rate by up to 4.2% on image description tasks.

Pritam Sarkar, Sayna Ebrahimi, Ali Etemad, Ahmad Beirami, Sercan \"O. Ar{\i}k, Tomas Pfister• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Hallucination EvaluationCHAIR
CHAIR_s41.4
393
Hallucination EvaluationMMHal-Bench
MMHal Score2.25
309
Hallucination EvaluationAMBER
CHAIR6.8
267
Multimodal EvaluationMMStar
Accuracy33.4
177
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE Adversarial
Accuracy83.2
174
Multimodal Hallucination EvaluationMMHal-Bench
Average Score2.58
140
Multimodal Visual PerceptionMMVP
Accuracy32.6
106
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE Popular
Accuracy85.5
100
Generative HallucinationAMBER Generative
Coverage (%)53
81
Hallucination EvaluationObject-HalBench
CHAIR Score (s)45.4
78
Showing 10 of 17 rows

Other info

Follow for update