Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

MMFakeBench: A Mixed-Source Multimodal Misinformation Detection Benchmark for LVLMs

About

Current multimodal misinformation detection (MMD) methods often assume a single source and type of forgery for each sample, which is insufficient for real-world scenarios where multiple forgery sources coexist. The lack of a benchmark for mixed-source misinformation has hindered progress in this field. To address this, we introduce MMFakeBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for mixed-source MMD. MMFakeBench includes 3 critical sources: textual veracity distortion, visual veracity distortion, and cross-modal consistency distortion, along with 12 sub-categories of misinformation forgery types. We further conduct an extensive evaluation of 6 prevalent detection methods and 15 Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) on MMFakeBench under a zero-shot setting. The results indicate that current methods struggle under this challenging and realistic mixed-source MMD setting. Additionally, we propose MMD-Agent, a novel approach to integrate the reasoning, action, and tool-use capabilities of LVLM agents, significantly enhancing accuracy and generalization. We believe this study will catalyze future research into more realistic mixed-source multimodal misinformation and provide a fair evaluation of misinformation detection methods.

Xuannan Liu, Zekun Li, Peipei Li, Huaibo Huang, Shuhan Xia, Xing Cui, Linzhi Huang, Weihong Deng, Zhaofeng He• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multi-modal manipulation detectionROM NYT domain 1.0 (test)
Accuracy61.34
23
Multi-modal manipulation detectionROM Wash. domain 1.0 (test)
Accuracy51.23
3
Multi-modal manipulation detectionROM Average across 5 domains 1.0 (test)
Accuracy57.45
3
Showing 3 of 3 rows

Other info

Follow for update