Booster: Tackling Harmful Fine-tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Perturbation
About
Harmful fine-tuning attack poses serious safety concerns for large language models' fine-tuning-as-a-service. While existing defenses have been proposed to mitigate the issue, their performances are still far away from satisfactory, and the root cause of the problem has not been fully recovered. To this end, we in this paper show that harmful perturbation over the model weights could be a probable cause of alignment-broken. In order to attenuate the negative impact of harmful perturbation, we propose an alignment-stage solution, dubbed Booster. Technically, along with the original alignment loss, we append a loss regularizer in the alignment stage's optimization. The regularizer ensures that the model's harmful loss reduction after the simulated harmful perturbation is attenuated, thereby mitigating the subsequent fine-tuning risk. Empirical results show that Booster can effectively reduce the harmful score of the fine-tuned models while maintaining the performance of downstream tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/git-disl/Booster.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction Following | AlpacaEval | -- | 420 | |
| Sentiment Classification | SST2 (test) | -- | 233 | |
| Instruction Following | Alpaca | -- | 173 | |
| Instruction Following | AlpacaEval (test) | Helpfulness Score54.3 | 65 | |
| Topic Classification | AGNews | FA Score0.867 | 58 | |
| Harmful score evaluation | BeaverTails (test) | Harmful Score0.416 | 52 | |
| News Classification | AG News (test) | Accuracy89.8 | 48 | |
| Malicious Fine-tuning Defense | BeaverTails (test) | Harmfulness Score1.26 | 44 | |
| Instruction Following and Safety Evaluation | Alpaca | BRT Score50.8 | 36 | |
| Sentiment Analysis | SST2 | FA Score92.59 | 27 |