Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Multi-label feature selection based on binary hashing learning and dynamic graph constraints

About

Multi-label learning poses significant challenges in extracting reliable supervisory signals from the label space. Existing approaches often employ continuous pseudo-labels to replace binary labels, improving supervisory information representation. However, these methods can introduce noise from irrelevant labels and lead to unreliable graph structures. To overcome these limitations, this study introduces a novel multi-label feature selection method called Binary Hashing and Dynamic Graph Constraint (BHDG), the first method to integrate binary hashing into multi-label learning. BHDG utilizes low-dimensional binary hashing codes as pseudo-labels to reduce noise and improve representation robustness. A dynamically constrained sample projection space is constructed based on the graph structure of these binary pseudo-labels, enhancing the reliability of the dynamic graph. To further enhance pseudo-label quality, BHDG incorporates label graph constraints and inner product minimization within the sample space. Additionally, an $l_{2,1}$-norm regularization term is added to the objective function to facilitate the feature selection process. The augmented Lagrangian multiplier (ALM) method is employed to optimize binary variables effectively. Comprehensive experiments on 10 benchmark datasets demonstrate that BHDG outperforms ten state-of-the-art methods across six evaluation metrics. BHDG achieves the highest overall performance ranking, surpassing the next-best method by an average of at least 2.7 ranks per metric, underscoring its effectiveness and robustness in multi-label feature selection.

Cong Guo, Changqin Huang, Wenhua Zhou, Xiaodi Huang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multi-Label ClassificationCorel5k
Ranking Loss0.9931
43
Multi-Label ClassificationAmphibians
Ranking Loss0.4067
11
Multi-Label ClassificationLanglog
Ranking Loss0.8251
11
Multi-Label ClassificationReuters
Ranking Loss0.4733
11
Multi-Label ClassificationScience
Ranking Loss0.9277
11
Multi-Label ClassificationYelp
Ranking Loss0.6087
11
Multi-label Feature SelectionAmphibians
AP47.59
11
Multi-label Feature SelectionLanglog
AP98.46
11
Multi-label Feature SelectionENRON
AP94.73
11
Multi-label Feature SelectionReuters
AP33.93
11
Showing 10 of 54 rows

Other info

Follow for update