Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

LightLoc: Learning Outdoor LiDAR Localization at Light Speed

About

Scene coordinate regression achieves impressive results in outdoor LiDAR localization but requires days of training. Since training needs to be repeated for each new scene, long training times make these methods impractical for time-sensitive applications, such as autonomous driving, drones, and robotics. We identify large coverage areas and vast data in large-scale outdoor scenes as key challenges that limit fast training. In this paper, we propose LightLoc, the first method capable of efficiently learning localization in a new scene at light speed. LightLoc introduces two novel techniques to address these challenges. First, we introduce sample classification guidance to assist regression learning, reducing ambiguity from similar samples and improving training efficiency. Second, we propose redundant sample downsampling to remove well-learned frames during training, reducing training time without compromising accuracy. Additionally, the fast training and confidence estimation capabilities of sample classification enable its integration into SLAM, effectively eliminating error accumulation. Extensive experiments on large-scale outdoor datasets demonstrate that LightLoc achieves state-of-the-art performance with a 50x reduction in training time than existing methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/liw95/LightLoc.

Wen Li, Chen Liu, Shangshu Yu, Dunqiang Liu, Yin Zhou, Siqi Shen, Chenglu Wen, Cheng Wang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
LiDAR LocalizationQEOxford Average
Mean Position (m)0.83
23
LiDAR LocalizationOxford (15-13-06-37)
Mean Position Error (m)0.82
23
LiDAR LocalizationOxford (17-13-26-39)
Mean Position Error (m)0.85
23
LiDAR LocalizationOxford (17-14-03-00)
Mean Position Error (m)0.81
23
LiDAR LocalizationOxford
Mean Position Error (m)2.67
12
LiDAR LocalizationNCLT 2012-02-19
Position Error (m)0.89
12
LiDAR LocalizationNCLT 2012-03-31
Position Error (m)0.86
12
LiDAR LocalizationOxford (Average)
Mean Position Error (m)2.67
12
LiDAR LocalizationNCLT 2012-02-12
Position Error (m)0.98
12
LiDAR LocalizationNCLT Average
Mean Position Error (m)1.46
12
Showing 10 of 24 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update