TAET: Two-Stage Adversarial Equalization Training on Long-Tailed Distributions
About
Adversarial robustness is a critical challenge in deploying deep neural networks for real-world applications. While adversarial training is a widely recognized defense strategy, most existing studies focus on balanced datasets, overlooking the prevalence of long-tailed distributions in real-world data, which significantly complicates robustness. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of adversarial training under long-tailed distributions and identifies limitations in the current state-of-the-art method, AT-BSL, in achieving robust performance under such conditions. To address these challenges, we propose a novel training framework, TAET, which integrates an initial stabilization phase followed by a stratified equalization adversarial training phase. Additionally, prior work on long-tailed robustness has largely ignored the crucial evaluation metric of balanced accuracy. To bridge this gap, we introduce the concept of balanced robustness, a comprehensive metric tailored for assessing robustness under long-tailed distributions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method surpasses existing advanced defenses, achieving significant improvements in both memory and computational efficiency. This work represents a substantial advancement in addressing robustness challenges in real-world applications. Our code is available at: https://github.com/BuhuiOK/TAET-Two-Stage-Adversarial-Equalization-Training-on-Long-Tailed-Distributions.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CIFAR100-LT (test) | -- | 45 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 long-tailed (test) | Clean Accuracy74.67 | 42 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10-LT | Clean Accuracy77.57 | 26 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100-LT IR=50 (test) | Top-1 Acc (IR 50)60.71 | 23 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 LT IR=10 (test) | Accuracy55.69 | 21 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10-LT IR=10 (test) | Accuracy (Clean)74.67 | 15 | |
| Image Classification | MedMNIST (test) | Clean Accuracy48.42 | 11 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 long-tail (IR=20) (test) | Accuracy (Clean)66.93 | 5 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 IR=100 long-tail (test) | Clean Accuracy52.68 | 5 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100-LT IR=100 (test) | Clean Accuracy59.56 | 2 |